PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSD vs. ONEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSD vs. ONEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSD achieves a 39.67% return, which is significantly higher than ONEQ's 16.16% return. Over the past 10 years, CSD has underperformed ONEQ with an annualized return of 14.07%, while ONEQ has yielded a comparatively higher 19.68% annualized return.


CSD

1D
0.47%
1M
8.22%
YTD
39.67%
6M
39.98%
1Y
71.88%
3Y*
36.42%
5Y*
16.45%
10Y*
14.07%

ONEQ

1D
-0.85%
1M
7.21%
YTD
16.16%
6M
15.18%
1Y
39.62%
3Y*
27.68%
5Y*
15.43%
10Y*
19.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSD vs. ONEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSD
Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF
39.67%21.58%27.61%23.77%-15.04%13.01%10.79%20.61%-17.82%20.64%
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
16.16%20.89%29.30%45.73%-32.12%22.11%44.87%38.01%-3.18%29.29%

Correlation

The correlation between CSD and ONEQ is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2006

0.73

The correlation between CSD and ONEQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

CSD vs. ONEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CSD
ONEQ

Industrials

31.1%
2.9%

Technology

18.6%
50.8%

Healthcare

13.1%
5.1%

Basic Materials

11.1%
1.0%

Communication Services

9.0%
16.7%

Utilities

7.0%
0.9%

Real Estate

5.1%
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

2.9%
13.3%

Financial Services

0.1%
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.2%

Energy

-

0.6%

Industrials

CSD
31.1%
ONEQ
2.9%

Technology

CSD
18.6%
ONEQ
50.8%

Healthcare

CSD
13.1%
ONEQ
5.1%

Basic Materials

CSD
11.1%
ONEQ
1.0%

Communication Services

CSD
9.0%
ONEQ
16.7%

Utilities

CSD
7.0%
ONEQ
0.9%

Real Estate

CSD
5.1%
ONEQ
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

CSD
2.9%
ONEQ
13.3%

Financial Services

CSD
0.1%
ONEQ
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

CSD

-

ONEQ
5.2%

Energy

CSD

-

ONEQ
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSD vs. ONEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSD
CSD Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
CSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSD Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

ONEQ
ONEQ Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ONEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSD vs. ONEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSDONEQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.43

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.37

3.15

+3.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.98

12.46

+12.52

CSD vs. ONEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSD Sharpe Ratio is 3.03, which is comparable to the ONEQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSD and ONEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSDONEQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.03

2.48

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.70

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.91

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.65

-0.22

Drawdowns

CSD vs. ONEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSD drawdown since its inception was -70.47%, which is greater than ONEQ's maximum drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSD and ONEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSDONEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.47%

-55.09%

-15.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.34%

-12.64%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.15%

-24.09%

-6.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.15%

-35.23%

+5.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.55%

-35.23%

-22.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.85%

+0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.23%

-7.95%

-6.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

3.19%

-0.30%

Volatility

CSD vs. ONEQ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) has a higher volatility of 6.19% compared to Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) at 4.20%. This indicates that CSD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ONEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSDONEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.19%

4.20%

+1.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.29%

11.96%

+6.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.87%

16.05%

+7.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.26%

22.14%

+1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.83%

21.71%

+3.12%

CSD vs. ONEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSD has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ONEQ's 0.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSD vs. ONEQ - Dividend Comparison

CSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than ONEQ's 0.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSD
Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF
0.11%0.16%0.17%0.51%0.86%0.73%0.99%1.08%0.99%0.60%1.62%2.61%
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
0.67%0.54%0.65%0.71%0.97%0.54%0.71%2.51%1.08%0.84%1.12%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSD and ONEQ have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSD has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to ONEQ (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSD dropped -70.47% vs ONEQ's -55.09%.

On 10-year performance, ONEQ leads with 19.68% vs 14.07% for CSD. On fees, ONEQ is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, ONEQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ONEQ has performed better with a 19.68% return vs 14.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ONEQ is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CSD.

ONEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.11% for CSD.

CSD is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while ONEQ is Large Cap Growth Equities. CSD tracks S&P U.S. Spin-Off Index, while ONEQ tracks Nasdaq Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CSD and 0.21% for ONEQ.

CSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSD and ONEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer