PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSD vs. ONEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSD vs. ONEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSD achieves a 37.45% return, which is significantly higher than ONEQ's 14.38% return. Over the past 10 years, CSD has underperformed ONEQ with an annualized return of 13.34%, while ONEQ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.81% annualized return.


CSD

1D
-1.18%
1M
-3.33%
6M
21.82%
YTD
37.45%
1Y
60.59%
3Y*
33.19%
5Y*
16.55%
10Y*
13.34%
ALL TIME*
10.09%

ONEQ

1D
-0.86%
1M
0.97%
6M
15.98%
YTD
14.38%
1Y
27.34%
3Y*
24.95%
5Y*
13.40%
10Y*
18.81%
ALL TIME*
13.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.39M$2.20M$2.21M
$40.10M$33.39M$39.94M

CSD vs. ONEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSD
Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF
37.45%21.58%27.61%23.77%-15.04%13.01%10.79%20.61%-17.82%20.64%
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
14.38%20.89%29.30%45.73%-32.12%22.11%44.87%38.01%-3.18%29.29%

Correlation

The correlation between CSD and ONEQ is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2006

0.73

The correlation between CSD and ONEQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

CSD vs. ONEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CSD
ONEQ

Industrials

35.5%
5.7%

Technology

23.5%
53.3%

Healthcare

12.8%
5.1%

Utilities

7.3%
0.8%

Basic Materials

6.8%
0.9%

Communication Services

5.2%
14.3%

Real Estate

3.8%
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

2.4%
11.9%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
4.3%

Financial Services

0.1%
2.8%

Energy

-

0.5%

Industrials

CSD
35.5%
ONEQ
5.7%

Technology

CSD
23.5%
ONEQ
53.3%

Healthcare

CSD
12.8%
ONEQ
5.1%

Utilities

CSD
7.3%
ONEQ
0.8%

Basic Materials

CSD
6.8%
ONEQ
0.9%

Communication Services

CSD
5.2%
ONEQ
14.3%

Real Estate

CSD
3.8%
ONEQ
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

CSD
2.4%
ONEQ
11.9%

Consumer Defensive

CSD
1.0%
ONEQ
4.3%

Financial Services

CSD
0.1%
ONEQ
2.8%

Energy

CSD

-

ONEQ
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSD vs. ONEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CSD
CSD Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSD Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSD Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

ONEQ
ONEQ Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
ONEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CSD vs. ONEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSDONEQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.26

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.07

2.17

+2.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.32

7.25

+8.07

CSD vs. ONEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSD Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the ONEQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSD and ONEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSD vs. ONEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSD drawdown since its inception was -70.47%, which is greater than ONEQ's maximum drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSD and ONEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSDONEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.47%

-55.09%

-15.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.02%

-12.64%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.15%

-24.09%

-6.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.15%

-35.23%

+5.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.55%

-35.23%

-22.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.46%

-2.36%

-6.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.15%

-7.93%

-6.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.97%

3.78%

+0.19%

Volatility

CSD vs. ONEQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) is 5.27%, while Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) has a volatility of 6.45%. This indicates that CSD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSDONEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.27%

6.45%

-1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.52%

14.83%

+4.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.84%

18.35%

+7.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.60%

22.53%

+1.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.99%

21.85%

+3.14%

CSD vs. ONEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSD has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ONEQ's 0.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSD vs. ONEQ - Dividend Comparison

CSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than ONEQ's 0.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSD
Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF
0.12%0.16%0.17%0.51%0.86%0.73%0.99%1.08%0.99%0.60%1.62%2.61%
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
0.85%0.54%0.65%0.71%0.97%0.54%0.71%2.51%1.08%0.84%1.12%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSD and ONEQ have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ONEQ has higher volatility (6.45%) compared to CSD (5.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSD dropped -70.47% vs ONEQ's -55.09%.

On 10-year performance, ONEQ leads with 18.81% vs 13.34% for CSD. On fees, ONEQ is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, CSD has been the lower-risk option at 5.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ONEQ has performed better with a 18.81% return vs 13.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ONEQ is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CSD.

ONEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.12% for CSD.

CSD is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while ONEQ is Large Cap Growth Equities. CSD tracks S&P U.S. Spin-Off Index, while ONEQ tracks Nasdaq Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CSD and 0.21% for ONEQ.

CSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSD and ONEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer