Correlation
The correlation between CSA and IWM is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
CSA vs. IWM
Compare and contrast key facts about VictoryShares US Small Cap Volatility Wtd ETF (CSA) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM).
CSA and IWM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CSA is a passively managed fund by Crestview that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Victory US 500 Small Volatility Weighted Index. It was launched on Jul 8, 2015. IWM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. Both CSA and IWM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CSA or IWM.
Performance
CSA vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
Returns By Period
CSA
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
IWM
-6.98%
4.59%
-14.77%
0.80%
4.86%
9.47%
6.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSA vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CSA vs. IWM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CSA
IWM
CSA vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Small Cap Volatility Wtd ETF (CSA) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
CSA vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
CSA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSA VictoryShares US Small Cap Volatility Wtd ETF | 1.53% | 1.45% | 1.23% | 1.42% | 1.25% | 1.30% | 1.35% | 1.44% | 1.06% | 1.01% | 0.74% | 0.00% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 1.20% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% | 1.26% |
Drawdowns
CSA vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
Loading data...
Volatility
CSA vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
Loading data...