CSA vs. FNCMX
Compare and contrast key facts about VictoryShares US Small Cap Volatility Wtd ETF (CSA) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX).
CSA is a passively managed fund by Crestview that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Victory US 500 Small Volatility Weighted Index. It was launched on Jul 8, 2015. FNCMX is managed by Fidelity.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CSA or FNCMX.
Performance
CSA vs. FNCMX - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSA achieves a 20.96% return, which is significantly lower than FNCMX's 27.36% return.
CSA
20.96%
10.03%
17.83%
35.27%
12.78%
N/A
FNCMX
27.36%
4.06%
12.67%
34.11%
17.62%
15.28%
Key characteristics
| CSA | FNCMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.89 | 1.95 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.77 | 2.56 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.34 | 1.35 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.55 | 2.60 |
| Martin Ratio | 11.12 | 9.74 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.17% | 3.50% |
| Daily Std Dev | 18.65% | 17.50% |
| Max Drawdown | -42.40% | -55.71% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -1.48% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSA vs. FNCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FNCMX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between CSA and FNCMX is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CSA vs. FNCMX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Small Cap Volatility Wtd ETF (CSA) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CSA vs. FNCMX - Dividend Comparison
CSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, more than FNCMX's 0.52% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSA VictoryShares US Small Cap Volatility Wtd ETF | 1.26% | 1.23% | 1.42% | 1.25% | 1.30% | 1.35% | 1.44% | 1.05% | 1.01% | 0.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.88% | 0.47% | 0.67% | 0.97% | 0.94% | 0.70% | 0.91% | 0.89% | 0.80% | 0.72% |
Drawdowns
CSA vs. FNCMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSA drawdown since its inception was -42.40%, smaller than the maximum FNCMX drawdown of -55.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSA and FNCMX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CSA vs. FNCMX - Volatility Comparison
VictoryShares US Small Cap Volatility Wtd ETF (CSA) has a higher volatility of 7.48% compared to Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) at 5.54%. This indicates that CSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.