CRWD vs. CYBR

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) and CyberArk Software Ltd. (CYBR).

Performance

CRWD vs. CYBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) and CyberArk Software Ltd. (CYBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CRWD vs. CYBR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.	-16.10%	37.00%	34.01%	142.49%	-48.58%	-3.34%	324.74%	-14.02%
CYBR CyberArk Software Ltd.	-8.34%	33.89%	52.09%	68.95%	-25.18%	7.23%	38.61%	-12.01%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CRWD : $101.53B CYBR : $20.69B
EPS CRWD : -$0.73 CYBR : -$2.92
PS Ratio CRWD : 20.59 CYBR : 15.13
PB Ratio CRWD : 22.93 CYBR : 8.61
Total Revenue (TTM) CRWD : $4.81B CYBR : $1.36B
Gross Profit (TTM) CRWD : $3.60B CYBR : $1.01B
EBITDA (TTM) CRWD : -$39.16M CYBR : $59.13M

Returns By Period

CRWD

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: 2.20%
• YTD: -16.10%
• 6M: -21.33%
• 1Y: 8.54%
• 3Y*: 42.04%
• 5Y*: 16.03%
• 10Y*: —

CYBR

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CRWD vs. CYBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRWD

CRWD Risk / Return Rank: 47
CRWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
CRWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
CRWD Omega Ratio Rank: 43
CRWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
CRWD Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRWD vs. CYBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) and CyberArk Software Ltd. (CYBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRWD	CYBR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.19	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.60	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.31	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.79	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRWD	CYBR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between CRWD and CYBR is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CRWD vs. CYBR - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRWD nor CYBR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CRWD	CYBR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.69%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-67.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.45%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.93%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.60%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRWD	CYBR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.42%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.05%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.39%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.17%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.91%	—	—

Financials

CRWD vs. CYBR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and CyberArk Software Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CRWD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 989.46M and revenue of 1.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.8%.

CYBR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CyberArk Software Ltd. reported a gross profit of 267.25M and revenue of 372.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.7%.

CRWD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -6.90M and revenue of 1.31B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.5%.

CYBR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CyberArk Software Ltd. reported an operating income of 1.75M and revenue of 372.65M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.5%.

CRWD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 38.69M and revenue of 1.31B, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.

CYBR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CyberArk Software Ltd. reported a net income of -17.11M and revenue of 372.65M, resulting in a net margin of -4.6%.