CRWD vs. CIBR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR).

CIBR is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. It was launched on Jul 7, 2015.

Performance

CRWD vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CRWD vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.	-16.71%	37.00%	34.01%	142.49%	-48.58%	-3.34%	324.74%	-14.02%
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	-12.12%	13.06%	18.21%	39.71%	-26.46%	19.67%	50.53%	6.85%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRWD achieves a -16.71% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's -12.12% return.

CRWD

• 1D: 2.72%
• 1M: 4.95%
• YTD: -16.71%
• 6M: -20.39%
• 1Y: 10.73%
• 3Y*: 41.69%
• 5Y*: 15.86%
• 10Y*: —

CIBR

• 1D: 3.11%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: -12.12%
• 6M: -17.17%
• 1Y: 0.06%
• 3Y*: 14.11%
• 5Y*: 8.62%
• 10Y*: 14.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CRWD vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRWD

CRWD Risk / Return Rank: 49
CRWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
CRWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
CRWD Omega Ratio Rank: 46
CRWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
CRWD Martin Ratio Rank: 50

CIBR

CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 12
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 13
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRWD vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRWD	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.24	0.00	+0.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.66	0.17	+0.49
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.02	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.25	-0.03	+0.28
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.64	-0.07	+0.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRWD vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRWD Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is higher than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRWD and CIBR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRWD	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24	0.00	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	0.36	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.51	+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between CRWD and CIBR is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

CRWD vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

CRWD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	0.65%	0.42%	0.29%	0.42%	0.31%	0.59%	1.10%	0.23%	0.23%	0.10%	0.77%	0.58%

Drawdowns

CRWD vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRWD drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWD and CIBR.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRWD	CIBR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.69%	-33.89%	-33.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.18%	-21.96%	-15.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-67.69%	-33.89%	-33.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.98%	-19.50%	-10.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.92%	-8.66%	-15.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.48%	8.02%	+6.46%

Volatility

CRWD vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) has a higher volatility of 13.51% compared to First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) at 7.04%. This indicates that CRWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRWD	CIBR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.51%	7.04%	+6.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.04%	16.45%	+14.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.40%	24.46%	+20.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.18%	24.21%	+25.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.93%	23.22%	+32.71%