PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRVL vs. SSNC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CRVL vs. SSNC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CorVel Corporation (CRVL) and SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. (SSNC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRVL achieves a -11.79% return, which is significantly higher than SSNC's -23.72% return. Over the past 10 years, CRVL has outperformed SSNC with an annualized return of 15.41%, while SSNC has yielded a comparatively lower 10.34% annualized return.


CRVL

1D
3.63%
1M
-4.86%
YTD
-11.79%
6M
-12.27%
1Y
-42.20%
3Y*
-3.66%
5Y*
6.62%
10Y*
15.41%

SSNC

1D
1.61%
1M
-0.89%
YTD
-23.72%
6M
-25.16%
1Y
-16.93%
3Y*
5.69%
5Y*
-0.56%
10Y*
10.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRVL vs. SSNC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CRVL
CorVel Corporation
-11.79%-39.18%35.02%70.10%-30.13%96.23%21.34%41.54%16.67%44.54%
SSNC
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.
-23.72%16.77%25.78%19.21%-35.65%13.73%19.51%37.15%12.09%42.53%

Correlation

The correlation between CRVL and SSNC is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2010

0.37

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CRVL:

$3.06B

SSNC:

$16.39B

EPS

CRVL:

$2.14

SSNC:

$3.23

PE Ratio

CRVL:

27.93

SSNC:

20.52

PEG Ratio

CRVL:

1.89

SSNC:

9.00

PS Ratio

CRVL:

3.21

SSNC:

2.59

PB Ratio

CRVL:

7.76

SSNC:

2.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRVL:

$958.53M

SSNC:

$6.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRVL:

$232.86M

SSNC:

$3.08B

EBITDA (TTM)

CRVL:

$166.41M

SSNC:

$1.97B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRVL vs. SSNC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRVL
CRVL Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
CRVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRVL Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
CRVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRVL Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

SSNC
SSNC Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
SSNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSNC Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
SSNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSNC Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRVL vs. SSNC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CorVel Corporation (CRVL) and SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. (SSNC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CRVLSSNCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

0.89

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.75

-0.61

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.19

-1.20

+0.01

CRVL vs. SSNC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRVL Sharpe Ratio is -1.02, which is lower than the SSNC Sharpe Ratio of -0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRVL and SSNC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRVL vs. SSNC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRVL drawdown since its inception was -67.12%, which is greater than SSNC's maximum drawdown of -48.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRVL and SSNC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRVLSSNCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.12%

-48.86%

-18.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.07%

-27.83%

-28.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.19%

-27.83%

-36.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.19%

-44.33%

-19.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.19%

-48.86%

-15.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.53%

-25.75%

-27.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.39%

-11.76%

-8.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.62%

14.15%

+21.47%

Volatility

CRVL vs. SSNC - Volatility Comparison

CorVel Corporation (CRVL) has a higher volatility of 12.22% compared to SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. (SSNC) at 6.65%. This indicates that CRVL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSNC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRVLSSNCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.22%

6.65%

+5.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.26%

20.82%

+18.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.41%

24.33%

+17.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.40%

24.34%

+9.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.39%

28.14%

+6.25%

Dividends

CRVL vs. SSNC - Dividend Comparison

CRVL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SSNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRVL
CorVel Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SSNC
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.
1.63%1.19%1.29%1.44%1.54%0.83%0.73%0.69%0.67%0.65%0.87%0.73%

Financials

CRVL vs. SSNC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CorVel Corporation and SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
248.55M
1.65B
(CRVL) Total Revenue
(SSNC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CRVL vs. SSNC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CorVel Corporation and SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%20222023202420252026
25.4%
48.7%
Portfolio components
CRVL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CorVel Corporation reported a gross profit of 63.01M and revenue of 248.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.4%.

SSNC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 801.80M and revenue of 1.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.7%.

CRVL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CorVel Corporation reported an operating income of 39.72M and revenue of 248.55M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.0%.

SSNC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 398.20M and revenue of 1.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.2%.

CRVL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CorVel Corporation reported a net income of 31.03M and revenue of 248.55M, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.

SSNC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 226.10M and revenue of 1.65B, resulting in a net margin of 13.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRVL and SSNC have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRVL has higher volatility (12.22%) compared to SSNC (6.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRVL dropped -67.12% vs SSNC's -48.86%.

SSNC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.70 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRVL and SSNC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer