PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRT vs. INMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CRT vs. INMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) and InMode Ltd. (INMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRT achieves a 35.97% return, which is significantly higher than INMD's -8.10% return.


CRT

1D
1.24%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
35.97%
6M
30.88%
1Y
18.59%
3Y*
-15.28%
5Y*
10.26%
10Y*
4.22%

INMD

1D
-0.66%
1M
-6.32%
YTD
-8.10%
6M
-5.20%
1Y
-5.92%
3Y*
-26.14%
5Y*
-19.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRT vs. INMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CRT
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
35.97%-13.15%-39.15%-24.36%145.90%53.31%5.38%-7.33%
INMD
InMode Ltd.
-8.10%-12.04%-24.91%-37.70%-49.42%197.30%21.12%188.87%

Correlation

The correlation between CRT and INMD is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2019

0.10

The correlation between CRT and INMD shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.11 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CRT:

$63.66M

INMD:

$863.22M

EPS

CRT:

$0.54

INMD:

$1.36

PE Ratio

CRT:

19.83

INMD:

9.89

PS Ratio

CRT:

14.15

INMD:

2.30

PB Ratio

CRT:

29.95

INMD:

1.31

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRT:

$4.50M

INMD:

$374.64M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRT:

$4.33M

INMD:

$291.61M

EBITDA (TTM)

CRT:

$3.36M

INMD:

$98.61M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRT vs. INMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRT
CRT Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
CRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRT Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRT Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

INMD
INMD Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
INMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
INMD Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
INMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
INMD Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRT vs. INMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) and InMode Ltd. (INMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRTINMDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.61

-0.18

+0.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.11

-0.03

+1.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.00

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.45

-0.34

+0.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.96

-0.72

+1.68

CRT vs. INMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRT Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is higher than the INMD Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRT and INMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRTINMDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

-0.18

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

-0.38

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.17

+0.07

Drawdowns

CRT vs. INMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRT drawdown since its inception was -83.57%, roughly equal to the maximum INMD drawdown of -86.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRT and INMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRTINMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.57%

-86.96%

+3.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.94%

-23.23%

-5.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.06%

-72.28%

+5.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.10%

-86.96%

+15.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.59%

-86.20%

+31.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.39%

-55.94%

+26.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.48%

11.00%

+2.48%

Volatility

CRT vs. INMD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) is 5.58%, while InMode Ltd. (INMD) has a volatility of 7.91%. This indicates that CRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRTINMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.58%

7.91%

-2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.89%

25.37%

-2.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.82%

33.40%

-2.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.47%

52.32%

-1.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.02%

60.98%

-14.96%

Dividends

CRT vs. INMD - Dividend Comparison

CRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, while INMD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRT
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
4.92%9.41%9.56%10.96%7.69%9.71%9.45%10.04%13.06%6.87%5.90%10.41%
INMD
InMode Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CRT vs. INMD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cross Timbers Royalty Trust and InMode Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00M120.00M140.00M20222023202420252026
787.85K
82.02M
(CRT) Total Revenue
(INMD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CRT vs. INMD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cross Timbers Royalty Trust and InMode Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

75.0%80.0%85.0%90.0%95.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
95.8%
75.1%
Portfolio components
CRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported a gross profit of 754.63K and revenue of 787.85K. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.8%.

INMD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, InMode Ltd. reported a gross profit of 61.55M and revenue of 82.02M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.1%.

CRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported an operating income of 503.41K and revenue of 787.85K, resulting in an operating margin of 63.9%.

INMD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, InMode Ltd. reported an operating income of 10.06M and revenue of 82.02M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.3%.

CRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported a net income of 503.41K and revenue of 787.85K, resulting in a net margin of 63.9%.

INMD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, InMode Ltd. reported a net income of 11.56M and revenue of 82.02M, resulting in a net margin of 14.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRT and INMD have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INMD has higher volatility (7.91%) compared to CRT (5.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRT dropped -83.57% vs INMD's -86.96%.

CRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRT and INMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer