CRT vs. INMD
CRT (Cross Timbers Royalty Trust) and INMD (InMode Ltd.) are both stocks. CRT operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while INMD operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, CRT returned 4.93%/yr vs -23.25%/yr for INMD. Their 0.10 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CRT vs. INMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRT achieves a 32.43% return, which is significantly higher than INMD's 3.06% return.
CRT
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 13.99%
- 6M
- 19.19%
- YTD
- 32.43%
- 1Y
- 21.82%
- 3Y*
- -14.68%
- 5Y*
- 4.93%
- 10Y*
- 2.55%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.44%
INMD
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- 6M
- -3.63%
- YTD
- 3.06%
- 1Y
- 10.19%
- 3Y*
- -29.84%
- 5Y*
- -23.25%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.12%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $142.29K | $133.91K | $199.67K | |
INMD InMode Ltd. | $8.32M | $9.69M | $11.98M |
CRT vs. INMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRT Cross Timbers Royalty Trust | 32.43% | -13.15% | -39.15% | -24.36% | 145.90% | 53.31% | 5.38% | -4.41% |
INMD InMode Ltd. | 3.06% | -12.04% | -24.91% | -37.70% | -49.42% | 197.30% | 21.12% | 187.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRT and INMD is -0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2019 | 0.10 |
The correlation between CRT and INMD shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CRT:
$61.32M
INMD:
$870.26M
CRT:
$0.54
INMD:
$1.36
CRT:
19.10
INMD:
11.11
CRT:
13.63
INMD:
2.58
CRT:
28.85
INMD:
1.46
CRT:
$4.50M
INMD:
$374.64M
CRT:
$4.33M
INMD:
$291.61M
CRT:
$3.36M
INMD:
$98.61M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRT vs. INMD — Risk / Return Rank
CRT
INMD
CRT vs. INMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) and InMode Ltd. (INMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRT | INMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.09 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 0.47 | +0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.10 | 0.91 | +1.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRT vs. INMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRT drawdown since its inception was -83.57%, roughly equal to the maximum INMD drawdown of -86.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRT and INMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRT | INMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.57% | -86.96% | +3.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.63% | -23.23% | +1.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.52% | -70.44% | +6.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.10% | -86.96% | +15.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.78% | -84.53% | +28.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.52% | -56.60% | +27.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.82% | 11.91% | -2.09% |
Volatility
CRT vs. INMD - Volatility Comparison
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) has a higher volatility of 8.82% compared to InMode Ltd. (INMD) at 6.68%. This indicates that CRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRT | INMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.82% | 6.68% | +2.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.39% | 22.99% | -0.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.03% | 33.43% | -0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.11% | 51.91% | -1.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.09% | 60.45% | -14.36% |
Dividends
CRT vs. INMD - Dividend Comparison
CRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.49%, while INMD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRT Cross Timbers Royalty Trust | 5.49% | 9.41% | 9.56% | 10.96% | 7.69% | 9.71% | 9.45% | 10.04% | 13.06% | 6.87% | 5.90% | 10.41% |
INMD InMode Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CRT vs. INMD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cross Timbers Royalty Trust and InMode Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CRT vs. INMD - Profitability Comparison
CRT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported a gross profit of 754.63K and revenue of 787.85K. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.8%.
INMD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, InMode Ltd. reported a gross profit of 61.55M and revenue of 82.02M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.1%.
CRT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported an operating income of 503.41K and revenue of 787.85K, resulting in an operating margin of 63.9%.
INMD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, InMode Ltd. reported an operating income of 10.06M and revenue of 82.02M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.3%.
CRT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported a net income of 503.41K and revenue of 787.85K, resulting in a net margin of 63.9%.
INMD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, InMode Ltd. reported a net income of 11.56M and revenue of 82.02M, resulting in a net margin of 14.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRT and INMD have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRT has higher volatility (8.82%) compared to INMD (6.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRT dropped -83.57% vs INMD's -86.96%.
CRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRT and INMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer