CRT vs. ICMB

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CRT (Cross Timbers Royalty Trust) and ICMB (Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc.) are both stocks. CRT operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while ICMB operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, CRT returned 4.22%/yr vs -5.96%/yr for ICMB. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CRT vs. ICMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) and Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc. (ICMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRT achieves a 35.97% return, which is significantly higher than ICMB's -56.30% return. Over the past 10 years, CRT has outperformed ICMB with an annualized return of 4.22%, while ICMB has yielded a comparatively lower -5.96% annualized return.

CRT

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: -0.01%
• YTD: 35.97%
• 6M: 30.88%
• 1Y: 18.59%
• 3Y*: -15.28%
• 5Y*: 10.26%
• 10Y*: 4.22%

ICMB

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -35.52%
• YTD: -56.30%
• 6M: -58.60%
• 1Y: -52.53%
• 3Y*: -21.34%
• 5Y*: -15.94%
• 10Y*: -5.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRT vs. ICMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CRT Cross Timbers Royalty Trust	35.97%	-13.15%	-39.15%	-24.36%	145.90%	53.31%	5.38%	-13.04%	-17.93%	-12.70%
ICMB Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc.	-56.30%	5.92%	0.74%	19.01%	-18.96%	15.99%	-16.38%	23.01%	-13.98%	-2.71%

Correlation

The correlation between CRT and ICMB is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.06
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2014	0.10

Fundamentals

EPS CRT : $0.54 ICMB : -$0.74
PS Ratio CRT : 14.15 ICMB : 1.74
Total Revenue (TTM) CRT : $4.50M ICMB : $6.51M
Gross Profit (TTM) CRT : $4.33M ICMB : $729.57K
EBITDA (TTM) CRT : $3.36M ICMB : -$9.28M

Return for Risk

CRT vs. ICMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRT

CRT Risk / Return Rank: 54
CRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
CRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
CRT Omega Ratio Rank: 54
CRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
CRT Martin Ratio Rank: 51

ICMB

ICMB Risk / Return Rank: 4
ICMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
ICMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
ICMB Omega Ratio Rank: 4
ICMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
ICMB Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRT vs. ICMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) and Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc. (ICMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRT	ICMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.61	-1.06	+1.67
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.11	-1.49	+2.61
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	0.78	+0.36
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.45	-0.84	+1.29
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.96	-2.31	+3.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRT vs. ICMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRT Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is higher than the ICMB Sharpe Ratio of -1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRT and ICMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRT	ICMB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61	-1.06	+1.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20	-0.41	+0.61
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.09	-0.13	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	-0.17	+0.42

Drawdowns

CRT vs. ICMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRT drawdown since its inception was -83.57%, roughly equal to the maximum ICMB drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRT and ICMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRT	ICMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.57%	-80.34%	-3.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.94%	-61.81%	+32.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-67.06%	-61.81%	-5.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-71.10%	-63.40%	-7.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-71.10%	-80.34%	+9.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-54.59%	-63.40%	+8.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.39%	-19.30%	-10.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.48%	22.43%	-8.95%

Volatility

CRT vs. ICMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) is 5.58%, while Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc. (ICMB) has a volatility of 16.14%. This indicates that CRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRT	ICMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.58%	16.14%	-10.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.89%	46.57%	-23.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.82%	49.75%	-18.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.47%	39.12%	+11.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.02%	44.41%	+1.61%

Dividends

CRT vs. ICMB - Dividend Comparison

CRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, less than ICMB's 23.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRT Cross Timbers Royalty Trust	4.92%	9.41%	9.56%	10.96%	7.69%	9.71%	9.45%	10.04%	13.06%	6.87%	5.90%	10.41%
ICMB Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc.	23.73%	19.26%	17.82%	17.72%	17.02%	12.73%	15.93%	14.93%	16.00%	12.27%	15.12%	18.14%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRT and ICMB in my portfolio?

CRT and ICMB have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRT or ICMB?

ICMB has higher volatility (16.14%) compared to CRT (5.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRT dropped -83.57% vs ICMB's -80.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.