PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRT vs. GOLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CRT vs. GOLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) and Barrick Mining Corporation (GOLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRT achieves a 9.96% return, which is significantly lower than GOLD's 25.52% return.


CRT

1D
0.35%
1M
-19.21%
YTD
9.96%
6M
12.41%
1Y
-6.07%
3Y*
-20.58%
5Y*
2.19%
10Y*
1.18%

GOLD

1D
1.36%
1M
-2.35%
YTD
25.52%
6M
26.68%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRT vs. GOLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CRT
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
9.96%-8.34%
GOLD
Barrick Mining Corporation
25.52%13.01%

Correlation

The correlation between CRT and GOLD is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025

0.01

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CRT:

$51.48M

GOLD:

$1.12B

EPS

CRT:

$0.54

GOLD:

$3.06

PE Ratio

CRT:

16.04

GOLD:

13.84

PS Ratio

CRT:

11.44

GOLD:

0.05

PB Ratio

CRT:

24.22

GOLD:

1.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRT:

$4.50M

GOLD:

$23.02B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRT:

$4.33M

GOLD:

$169.58M

EBITDA (TTM)

CRT:

$3.36M

GOLD:

-$162.41M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRT vs. GOLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRT
CRT Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
CRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRT Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
CRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRT Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

GOLD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRT vs. GOLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) and Barrick Mining Corporation (GOLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CRTGOLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.48

CRT vs. GOLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRT vs. GOLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRT drawdown since its inception was -83.57%, which is greater than GOLD's maximum drawdown of -40.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRT and GOLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRTGOLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.57%

-40.58%

-42.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.28%

-33.36%

-29.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.43%

-18.68%

-10.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.74%

Volatility

CRT vs. GOLD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRTGOLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.91%

57.50%

-25.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.51%

57.50%

-6.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.13%

57.50%

-11.37%

Dividends

CRT vs. GOLD - Dividend Comparison

CRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%, more than GOLD's 0.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRT
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
6.08%9.41%9.56%10.96%7.69%9.71%9.45%10.04%13.06%6.87%5.90%10.41%
GOLD
Barrick Mining Corporation
0.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CRT vs. GOLD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cross Timbers Royalty Trust and Barrick Mining Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
787.85K
10.35B
(CRT) Total Revenue
(GOLD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CRT vs. GOLD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cross Timbers Royalty Trust and Barrick Mining Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
95.8%
1.7%
Portfolio components
CRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported a gross profit of 754.63K and revenue of 787.85K. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.8%.

GOLD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barrick Mining Corporation reported a gross profit of 176.58M and revenue of 10.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 1.7%.

CRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported an operating income of 503.41K and revenue of 787.85K, resulting in an operating margin of 63.9%.

GOLD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barrick Mining Corporation reported an operating income of 106.13M and revenue of 10.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.0%.

CRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported a net income of 503.41K and revenue of 787.85K, resulting in a net margin of 63.9%.

GOLD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barrick Mining Corporation reported a net income of 59.49M and revenue of 10.35B, resulting in a net margin of 0.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRT and GOLD have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRT and GOLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer