PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRT vs. GNK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CRT vs. GNK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) and Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CRT having a 35.97% return and GNK slightly higher at 36.05%. Over the past 10 years, CRT has underperformed GNK with an annualized return of 4.22%, while GNK has yielded a comparatively higher 22.14% annualized return.


CRT

1D
1.24%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
35.97%
6M
30.88%
1Y
18.59%
3Y*
-15.28%
5Y*
10.26%
10Y*
4.22%

GNK

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
36.05%
6M
33.02%
1Y
94.84%
3Y*
29.05%
5Y*
17.61%
10Y*
22.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRT vs. GNK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CRT
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
35.97%-13.15%-39.15%-24.36%145.90%53.31%5.38%-13.04%-17.93%-12.70%
GNK
Genco Shipping & Trading Limited
36.05%39.12%-8.87%14.44%11.41%121.79%-28.23%41.19%-40.77%80.49%

Correlation

The correlation between CRT and GNK is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2014

0.17

The correlation between CRT and GNK shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CRT:

$63.66M

GNK:

$1.07B

EPS

CRT:

$0.54

GNK:

$212.52

PE Ratio

CRT:

19.83

GNK:

0.11

PS Ratio

CRT:

14.15

GNK:

0.01

PB Ratio

CRT:

29.95

GNK:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRT:

$4.50M

GNK:

$114.70B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRT:

$4.33M

GNK:

$72.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

CRT:

$3.36M

GNK:

$112.04M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRT vs. GNK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRT
CRT Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
CRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRT Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRT Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

GNK
GNK Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
GNK Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
GNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
GNK Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRT vs. GNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) and Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRTGNKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.61

2.79

-2.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.11

3.29

-2.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.43

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.45

4.84

-4.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.96

13.98

-13.01

CRT vs. GNK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRT Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the GNK Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRT and GNK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRTGNKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

2.79

-2.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.42

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

0.38

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

-0.21

+0.45

Drawdowns

CRT vs. GNK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRT drawdown since its inception was -83.57%, smaller than the maximum GNK drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRT and GNK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRTGNKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.57%

-98.25%

+14.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.94%

-19.16%

-9.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.06%

-47.06%

-20.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.10%

-53.91%

-17.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.10%

-75.46%

+4.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.59%

-81.86%

+27.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.39%

-88.20%

+58.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.48%

6.64%

+6.84%

Volatility

CRT vs. GNK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) is 5.58%, while Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) has a volatility of 11.73%. This indicates that CRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GNK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRTGNKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.58%

11.73%

-6.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.89%

26.88%

-3.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.82%

34.25%

-3.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.47%

41.67%

+8.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.02%

59.12%

-13.10%

Dividends

CRT vs. GNK - Dividend Comparison

CRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, more than GNK's 4.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRT
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
4.92%9.41%9.56%10.96%7.69%9.71%9.45%10.04%13.06%6.87%5.90%10.41%
GNK
Genco Shipping & Trading Limited
4.76%4.07%11.26%5.73%17.84%2.00%3.19%4.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CRT vs. GNK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cross Timbers Royalty Trust and Genco Shipping & Trading Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20222023202420252026
787.85K
114.43B
(CRT) Total Revenue
(GNK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CRT vs. GNK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cross Timbers Royalty Trust and Genco Shipping & Trading Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
95.8%
63.0%
Portfolio components
CRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported a gross profit of 754.63K and revenue of 787.85K. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.8%.

GNK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genco Shipping & Trading Limited reported a gross profit of 72.06B and revenue of 114.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.0%.

CRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported an operating income of 503.41K and revenue of 787.85K, resulting in an operating margin of 63.9%.

GNK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genco Shipping & Trading Limited reported an operating income of 13.31M and revenue of 114.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

CRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported a net income of 503.41K and revenue of 787.85K, resulting in a net margin of 63.9%.

GNK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genco Shipping & Trading Limited reported a net income of 9.31B and revenue of 114.43B, resulting in a net margin of 8.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRT and GNK have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GNK has higher volatility (11.73%) compared to CRT (5.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRT dropped -83.57% vs GNK's -98.25%.

GNK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRT and GNK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer