CRT vs. CROX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CRT (Cross Timbers Royalty Trust) and CROX (Crocs, Inc.) are both stocks. CRT operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while CROX operates in Footwear & Accessories (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, CRT returned 4.22%/yr vs 27.54%/yr for CROX. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CRT vs. CROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) and Crocs, Inc. (CROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CRT having a 35.97% return and CROX slightly higher at 36.65%. Over the past 10 years, CRT has underperformed CROX with an annualized return of 4.22%, while CROX has yielded a comparatively higher 27.54% annualized return.

CRT

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: -0.01%
• YTD: 35.97%
• 6M: 30.88%
• 1Y: 18.59%
• 3Y*: -15.28%
• 5Y*: 10.26%
• 10Y*: 4.22%

CROX

• 1D: -2.03%
• 1M: 12.50%
• YTD: 36.65%
• 6M: 37.08%
• 1Y: 15.22%
• 3Y*: 2.02%
• 5Y*: 2.95%
• 10Y*: 27.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRT vs. CROX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CRT Cross Timbers Royalty Trust	35.97%	-13.15%	-39.15%	-24.36%	145.90%	53.31%	5.38%	-13.04%	-17.93%	-12.70%
CROX Crocs, Inc.	36.65%	-21.92%	17.26%	-13.85%	-15.43%	104.63%	49.58%	61.24%	105.54%	84.26%

Correlation

The correlation between CRT and CROX is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.05
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2006	0.15

The correlation between CRT and CROX shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap CRT : $63.66M CROX : $5.93B
EPS CRT : $0.54 CROX : -$1.94
PS Ratio CRT : 14.15 CROX : 1.55
PB Ratio CRT : 29.95 CROX : 4.15
Total Revenue (TTM) CRT : $4.50M CROX : $4.02B
Gross Profit (TTM) CRT : $4.33M CROX : $2.34B
EBITDA (TTM) CRT : $3.36M CROX : $297.04M

Return for Risk

CRT vs. CROX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRT

CRT Risk / Return Rank: 54
CRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
CRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
CRT Omega Ratio Rank: 54
CRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
CRT Martin Ratio Rank: 51

CROX

CROX Risk / Return Rank: 50
CROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
CROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
CROX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
CROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
CROX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRT vs. CROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) and Crocs, Inc. (CROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRT	CROX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.61	0.29	+0.32
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.11	0.75	+0.36
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.11	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.45	0.45	0.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.96	0.76	+0.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRT vs. CROX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRT Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is higher than the CROX Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRT and CROX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRT	CROX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61	0.29	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20	0.05	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.09	0.49	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.17	+0.08

Drawdowns

CRT vs. CROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRT drawdown since its inception was -83.57%, smaller than the maximum CROX drawdown of -98.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRT and CROX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRT	CROX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.57%	-98.74%	+15.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.94%	-32.54%	+3.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-67.06%	-54.04%	-13.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-71.10%	-73.86%	+2.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-71.10%	-75.18%	+4.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-54.59%	-35.28%	-19.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.39%	-61.30%	+31.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.48%	19.17%	-5.69%

Volatility

CRT vs. CROX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) is 5.58%, while Crocs, Inc. (CROX) has a volatility of 11.40%. This indicates that CRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRT	CROX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.58%	11.40%	-5.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.89%	32.09%	-9.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.82%	52.43%	-21.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.47%	55.11%	-4.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.02%	55.96%	-9.94%

Dividends

CRT vs. CROX - Dividend Comparison

CRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, while CROX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CROX Crocs, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CRT Cross Timbers Royalty Trust	4.92%	9.41%	9.56%	10.96%	7.69%	9.71%	9.45%	10.04%	13.06%	6.87%	5.90%	10.41%

Financials

CRT vs. CROX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cross Timbers Royalty Trust and Crocs, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported a gross profit of 754.63K and revenue of 787.85K. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.8%.

CROX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported a gross profit of 522.95M and revenue of 921.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.8%.

CRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported an operating income of 503.41K and revenue of 787.85K, resulting in an operating margin of 63.9%.

CROX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported an operating income of 200.84M and revenue of 921.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.8%.

CRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported a net income of 503.41K and revenue of 787.85K, resulting in a net margin of 63.9%.

CROX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported a net income of 137.56M and revenue of 921.46M, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRT and CROX in my portfolio?

CRT and CROX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRT or CROX?

CROX has higher volatility (11.40%) compared to CRT (5.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRT dropped -83.57% vs CROX's -98.74%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.