CRT vs. CROX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) and Crocs, Inc. (CROX).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CRT or CROX.
Correlation
The correlation between CRT and CROX is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CRT vs. CROX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CRT:
-1.14
CROX:
0.01
CRT:
-1.80
CROX:
0.37
CRT:
0.78
CROX:
1.05
CRT:
-0.68
CROX:
0.01
CRT:
-1.41
CROX:
0.02
CRT:
32.31%
CROX:
16.32%
CRT:
40.00%
CROX:
47.02%
CRT:
-83.46%
CROX:
-98.74%
CRT:
-63.91%
CROX:
-41.47%
Fundamentals
CRT:
$58.62M
CROX:
$6.50B
CRT:
$1.13
CROX:
$13.77
CRT:
8.65
CROX:
8.10
CRT:
0.00
CROX:
-31.83
CRT:
$10.57M
CROX:
$4.07B
CRT:
$13.67M
CROX:
$2.37B
CRT:
$4.40M
CROX:
$1.10B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRT achieves a -42.90% return, which is significantly lower than CROX's 13.14% return. Over the past 10 years, CRT has underperformed CROX with an annualized return of 2.03%, while CROX has yielded a comparatively higher 24.19% annualized return.
CRT
-42.90%
-6.08%
-9.68%
-45.06%
14.91%
2.03%
CROX
13.14%
7.86%
-33.05%
4.76%
21.32%
24.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CRT vs. CROX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) and Crocs, Inc. (CROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CRT vs. CROX - Dividend Comparison
CRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.97%, while CROX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRT Cross Timbers Royalty Trust | 10.97% | 10.97% | 7.69% | 9.70% | 9.44% | 10.05% | 13.08% | 6.86% | 5.90% | 10.41% | 15.33% | 7.88% |
CROX Crocs, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CRT vs. CROX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRT drawdown since its inception was -83.46%, smaller than the maximum CROX drawdown of -98.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRT and CROX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CRT vs. CROX - Volatility Comparison
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) and Crocs, Inc. (CROX) have volatilities of 10.63% and 11.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CRT vs. CROX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cross Timbers Royalty Trust and Crocs, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities