PortfoliosLab logo
CRT vs. CROX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CRT and CROX is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CRT vs. CROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) and Crocs, Inc. (CROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CRT:

-0.55

CROX:

-0.36

Sortino Ratio

CRT:

-0.62

CROX:

-0.17

Omega Ratio

CRT:

0.93

CROX:

0.98

Calmar Ratio

CRT:

-0.34

CROX:

-0.35

Martin Ratio

CRT:

-0.96

CROX:

-0.66

Ulcer Index

CRT:

23.87%

CROX:

27.31%

Daily Std Dev

CRT:

40.58%

CROX:

52.87%

Max Drawdown

CRT:

-83.46%

CROX:

-98.74%

Current Drawdown

CRT:

-60.01%

CROX:

-35.06%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CRT:

$60.36M

CROX:

$6.63B

EPS

CRT:

$0.93

CROX:

$16.21

PE Ratio

CRT:

10.65

CROX:

7.30

PEG Ratio

CRT:

0.00

CROX:

-31.83

PS Ratio

CRT:

9.11

CROX:

1.62

PB Ratio

CRT:

24.41

CROX:

3.42

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRT:

$4.74M

CROX:

$4.10B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRT:

$7.89M

CROX:

$2.43B

EBITDA (TTM)

CRT:

$4.23M

CROX:

$1.07B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRT achieves a 3.99% return, which is significantly lower than CROX's 7.07% return. Over the past 10 years, CRT has underperformed CROX with an annualized return of 2.15%, while CROX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.21% annualized return.


CRT

YTD

3.99%

1M

-9.72%

6M

4.17%

1Y

-22.37%

5Y*

20.38%

10Y*

2.15%

CROX

YTD

7.07%

1M

30.40%

6M

17.43%

1Y

-18.97%

5Y*

37.48%

10Y*

22.21%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CRT vs. CROX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CRT is 2323
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CRT is 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CRT is 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CRT is 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CRT is 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CRT is 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

CROX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CROX is 3131
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CROX is 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CROX is 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CROX is 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CROX is 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CROX is 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CRT vs. CROX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) and Crocs, Inc. (CROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CRT Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is lower than the CROX Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRT and CROX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CRT vs. CROX - Dividend Comparison

CRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.91%, while CROX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CRT
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
8.91%9.55%10.97%7.69%9.70%9.44%10.05%13.08%6.86%5.90%10.41%15.33%
CROX
Crocs, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CRT vs. CROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRT drawdown since its inception was -83.46%, smaller than the maximum CROX drawdown of -98.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRT and CROX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CRT vs. CROX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) is 7.67%, while Crocs, Inc. (CROX) has a volatility of 14.53%. This indicates that CRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CRT vs. CROX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cross Timbers Royalty Trust and Crocs, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20212022202320242025
1.46M
937.33M
(CRT) Total Revenue
(CROX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CRT vs. CROX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cross Timbers Royalty Trust and Crocs, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
57.8%
(CRT) Gross Margin
(CROX) Gross Margin
CRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported a gross profit of 1.46M and revenue of 1.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

CROX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Crocs, Inc. reported a gross profit of 541.55M and revenue of 937.33M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.8%.

CRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported an operating income of 1.30M and revenue of 1.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 89.1%.

CROX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Crocs, Inc. reported an operating income of 222.97M and revenue of 937.33M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.8%.

CRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported a net income of 1.32M and revenue of 1.46M, resulting in a net margin of 90.1%.

CROX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Crocs, Inc. reported a net income of 160.10M and revenue of 937.33M, resulting in a net margin of 17.1%.