CRT vs. CROX

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) and Crocs, Inc. (CROX).

Performance

CRT vs. CROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) and Crocs, Inc. (CROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CRT vs. CROX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CRT Cross Timbers Royalty Trust	36.50%	-13.15%	-39.15%	-24.36%	145.90%	53.31%	5.38%	-13.04%	-17.93%	-12.70%
CROX Crocs, Inc.	-2.17%	-21.92%	17.26%	-13.85%	-15.43%	104.63%	49.58%	61.24%	105.54%	84.26%

Fundamentals

EPS CRT : $0.74 CROX : -$1.50
PS Ratio CRT : 11.52 CROX : 1.12
Total Revenue (TTM) CRT : $5.60M CROX : $4.04B
Gross Profit (TTM) CRT : $5.53M CROX : $2.36B
EBITDA (TTM) CRT : $4.51M CROX : $342.44M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRT achieves a 36.50% return, which is significantly higher than CROX's -2.17% return. Over the past 10 years, CRT has underperformed CROX with an annualized return of 5.62%, while CROX has yielded a comparatively higher 24.74% annualized return.

CRT

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: 19.72%
• YTD: 36.50%
• 6M: 50.32%
• 1Y: -2.75%
• 3Y*: -13.13%
• 5Y*: 14.11%
• 10Y*: 5.62%

CROX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -2.01%
• YTD: -2.17%
• 6M: -2.95%
• 1Y: -25.00%
• 3Y*: -13.37%
• 5Y*: 1.01%
• 10Y*: 24.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CRT vs. CROX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRT

CRT Risk / Return Rank: 34
CRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
CRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
CRT Omega Ratio Rank: 31
CRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
CRT Martin Ratio Rank: 35

CROX

CROX Risk / Return Rank: 21
CROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
CROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
CROX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
CROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
CROX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRT vs. CROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) and Crocs, Inc. (CROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRT	CROX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.08	-0.45	+0.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.13	-0.29	+0.42
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	0.96	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.17	-0.60	+0.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.29	-0.90	+0.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRT vs. CROX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRT Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is higher than the CROX Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRT and CROX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRT	CROX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08	-0.45	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	0.02	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.12	0.44	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.14	+0.10

Correlation

The correlation between CRT and CROX is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CRT vs. CROX - Dividend Comparison

CRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, while CROX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRT Cross Timbers Royalty Trust	4.98%	9.41%	9.56%	10.96%	7.69%	9.71%	9.45%	10.04%	13.06%	6.87%	5.90%	10.41%
CROX Crocs, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CRT vs. CROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRT drawdown since its inception was -83.57%, smaller than the maximum CROX drawdown of -98.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRT and CROX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRT	CROX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.57%	-98.74%	+15.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-38.87%	-38.97%	+0.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-71.10%	-73.86%	+2.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-71.10%	-75.18%	+4.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-54.42%	-53.67%	-0.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.27%	-61.45%	+32.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.73%	25.87%	-2.14%

Volatility

CRT vs. CROX - Volatility Comparison

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) has a higher volatility of 12.54% compared to Crocs, Inc. (CROX) at 10.39%. This indicates that CRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRT	CROX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.54%	10.39%	+2.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.05%	31.83%	-6.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.29%	56.24%	-21.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.49%	55.48%	-4.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.11%	56.91%	-10.80%

Financials

CRT vs. CROX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cross Timbers Royalty Trust and Crocs, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported a gross profit of 717.33K and revenue of 774.28K. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 92.7%.

CROX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported a gross profit of 523.66M and revenue of 957.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.7%.

CRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported an operating income of 440.59K and revenue of 774.28K, resulting in an operating margin of 56.9%.

CROX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported an operating income of 146.40M and revenue of 957.64M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.3%.

CRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported a net income of 453.32K and revenue of 774.28K, resulting in a net margin of 58.6%.

CROX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported a net income of 105.17M and revenue of 957.64M, resulting in a net margin of 11.0%.