CRT vs. CROX

In the year-to-date period, CRT achieves a -39.20% return, which is significantly lower than CROX's 4.89% return. Over the past 10 years, CRT has underperformed CROX with an annualized return of -1.52%, while CROX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.63% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) and Crocs, Inc. (CROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CRT Sharpe Ratio is -1.14, which is lower than the CROX Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRT and CROX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.79%, while CROX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum CRT drawdown since its inception was -83.46%, smaller than the maximum CROX drawdown of -98.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRT and CROX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) is 8.44%, while Crocs, Inc. (CROX) has a volatility of 22.30%. This indicates that CRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cross Timbers Royalty Trust and Crocs, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.