CRT vs. BIGZ

In the year-to-date period, CRT achieves a 5.32% return, which is significantly higher than BIGZ's -13.71% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) and Blackrock Innovation & Growth Trust (BIGZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CRT Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the BIGZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRT and BIGZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.79%, less than BIGZ's 16.36% yield.

The maximum CRT drawdown since its inception was -83.46%, which is greater than BIGZ's maximum drawdown of -67.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRT and BIGZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) has a higher volatility of 21.00% compared to Blackrock Innovation & Growth Trust (BIGZ) at 17.53%. This indicates that CRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIGZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cross Timbers Royalty Trust and Blackrock Innovation & Growth Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.