CRT vs. BIGZ

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) and Blackrock Innovation & Growth Trust (BIGZ).

Performance

CRT vs. BIGZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) and Blackrock Innovation & Growth Trust (BIGZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CRT vs. BIGZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CRT Cross Timbers Royalty Trust	34.47%	-13.15%	-39.15%	-24.36%	145.90%	43.63%
BIGZ Blackrock Innovation & Growth Trust	5.08%	0.86%	13.42%	19.29%	-47.76%	-24.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRT achieves a 34.47% return, which is significantly higher than BIGZ's 5.08% return.

CRT

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 17.81%
• YTD: 34.47%
• 6M: 47.04%
• 1Y: -8.18%
• 3Y*: -10.70%
• 5Y*: 13.77%
• 10Y*: 5.09%

BIGZ

• 1D: 2.42%
• 1M: 1.43%
• YTD: 5.08%
• 6M: 3.51%
• 1Y: 20.98%
• 3Y*: 5.73%
• 5Y*: -11.24%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CRT vs. BIGZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRT

CRT Risk / Return Rank: 29
CRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
CRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
CRT Omega Ratio Rank: 26
CRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
CRT Martin Ratio Rank: 31

BIGZ

BIGZ Risk / Return Rank: 66
BIGZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
BIGZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
BIGZ Omega Ratio Rank: 59
BIGZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
BIGZ Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRT vs. BIGZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) and Blackrock Innovation & Growth Trust (BIGZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRT	BIGZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.24	0.76	-1.00
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.11	1.29	-1.40
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.16	-0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.35	1.54	-1.89
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.55	3.70	-4.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRT vs. BIGZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRT Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the BIGZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRT and BIGZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRT	BIGZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.24	0.76	-1.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	-0.38	+0.66
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	-0.37	+0.61

Correlation

The correlation between CRT and BIGZ is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CRT vs. BIGZ - Dividend Comparison

CRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, less than BIGZ's 11.83% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRT Cross Timbers Royalty Trust	5.05%	9.41%	9.56%	10.96%	7.69%	9.71%	9.45%	10.04%	13.06%	6.87%	5.90%	10.41%
BIGZ Blackrock Innovation & Growth Trust	11.83%	13.68%	11.21%	10.45%	14.54%	4.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CRT vs. BIGZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRT drawdown since its inception was -83.57%, which is greater than BIGZ's maximum drawdown of -67.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRT and BIGZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRT	BIGZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.57%	-67.27%	-16.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-38.87%	-13.99%	-24.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-71.10%	-67.27%	-3.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-71.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.09%	-50.68%	-4.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.27%	-49.89%	+20.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.08%	5.83%	+20.25%

Volatility

CRT vs. BIGZ - Volatility Comparison

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) has a higher volatility of 12.52% compared to Blackrock Innovation & Growth Trust (BIGZ) at 9.78%. This indicates that CRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIGZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRT	BIGZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.52%	9.78%	+2.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.05%	18.29%	+6.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.93%	27.83%	+7.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.51%	29.52%	+20.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.12%	29.48%	+16.64%

Financials