CRM vs. AAPL

In the year-to-date period, CRM achieves a -18.78% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's -10.50% return. Over the past 10 years, CRM has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 15.17%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 23.16% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for salesforce.com, inc. (CRM) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CRM Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRM and AAPL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than AAPL's 0.45% yield.

The maximum CRM drawdown since its inception was -70.50%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRM and AAPL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

salesforce.com, inc. (CRM) and Apple Inc (AAPL) have volatilities of 9.23% and 8.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between salesforce.com, inc. and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.