PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRL vs. XLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRL vs. XLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRL achieves a -9.83% return, which is significantly lower than XLV's -4.29% return. Over the past 10 years, CRL has underperformed XLV with an annualized return of 7.68%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.20% annualized return.


CRL

1D
2.91%
1M
4.38%
YTD
-9.83%
6M
-2.60%
1Y
29.88%
3Y*
-3.58%
5Y*
-11.79%
10Y*
7.68%

XLV

1D
0.79%
1M
1.95%
YTD
-4.29%
6M
-4.06%
1Y
12.89%
3Y*
5.98%
5Y*
5.55%
10Y*
9.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRL vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CRL
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
-9.83%8.06%-21.91%8.49%-42.17%50.80%63.56%34.97%3.41%43.65%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
-4.29%14.50%2.47%2.07%-2.08%26.04%13.30%20.45%6.28%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between CRL and XLV is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2000

0.49

The correlation between CRL and XLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRL vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRL
CRL Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
CRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRL Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
CRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRL Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

XLV
XLV Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRL vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRLXLVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.67

0.88

-0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.17

1.42

-0.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.16

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.89

1.24

-0.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.85

2.99

-1.14

CRL vs. XLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRL Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is comparable to the XLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRL and XLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRLXLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

0.88

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.28

0.38

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

0.56

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.46

-0.22

Drawdowns

CRL vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRL drawdown since its inception was -78.23%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRL and XLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRLXLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.23%

-39.17%

-39.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.88%

-10.47%

-23.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.52%

-17.11%

-46.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.23%

-17.11%

-61.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.23%

-28.40%

-49.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.75%

-7.52%

-53.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.72%

-7.12%

-18.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.23%

4.32%

+11.91%

Volatility

CRL vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison

Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL) has a higher volatility of 17.68% compared to State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) at 4.10%. This indicates that CRL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRLXLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.68%

4.10%

+13.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.98%

10.24%

+24.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.98%

14.67%

+30.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.71%

14.69%

+28.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.74%

16.55%

+21.19%

Dividends

CRL vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison

CRL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRL
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.70%1.60%1.67%1.59%1.47%1.33%1.49%2.17%1.57%1.47%1.60%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


CRL and XLV have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRL has higher volatility (17.68%) compared to XLV (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRL dropped -78.23% vs XLV's -39.17%.

XLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRL and XLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer