PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CRL vs. ILMN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CRLILMN
YTD Return-8.65%8.99%
1Y Return27.00%63.55%
3Y Return (Ann)-17.66%-26.67%
5Y Return (Ann)9.46%-12.69%
10Y Return (Ann)13.01%-1.72%
Sharpe Ratio0.701.32
Sortino Ratio1.252.04
Omega Ratio1.161.23
Calmar Ratio0.410.66
Martin Ratio1.363.89
Ulcer Index18.80%13.94%
Daily Std Dev36.56%41.10%
Max Drawdown-69.81%-96.14%
Current Drawdown-52.88%-71.09%

Fundamentals


CRLILMN
Market Cap$11.29B$24.03B
EPS$8.01-$9.97
PEG Ratio2.840.71
Total Revenue (TTM)$4.06B$4.39B
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.37B$2.81B
EBITDA (TTM)$924.19M$1.43B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between CRL and ILMN is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CRL vs. ILMN - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CRL achieves a -8.65% return, which is significantly lower than ILMN's 8.99% return. Over the past 10 years, CRL has outperformed ILMN with an annualized return of 13.01%, while ILMN has yielded a comparatively lower -1.72% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-7.25%
31.30%
CRL
ILMN

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CRL vs. ILMN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL) and Illumina, Inc. (ILMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CRL, currently valued at 0.70, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.70
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CRL, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.25
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CRL, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.16
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CRL, currently valued at 0.41, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.41
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CRL, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.36
ILMN
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ILMN, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.32
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ILMN, currently valued at 2.04, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.04
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ILMN, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.23
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ILMN, currently valued at 0.66, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.66
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ILMN, currently valued at 3.89, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.003.89

CRL vs. ILMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRL Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the ILMN Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRL and ILMN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.70
1.32
CRL
ILMN

Dividends

CRL vs. ILMN - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRL nor ILMN has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CRL vs. ILMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRL drawdown since its inception was -69.81%, smaller than the maximum ILMN drawdown of -96.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRL and ILMN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-52.88%
-71.09%
CRL
ILMN

Volatility

CRL vs. ILMN - Volatility Comparison

Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL) has a higher volatility of 15.62% compared to Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) at 8.50%. This indicates that CRL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.62%
8.50%
CRL
ILMN

Financials

CRL vs. ILMN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. and Illumina, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items