CRIT vs. GNR
Compare and contrast key facts about Optica Rare Earths & Critical Materials ETF (CRIT) and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR).
CRIT and GNR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CRIT is a passively managed fund by CRIT that tracks the performance of the EQM Rare Earths & Critical Materials Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Mar 28, 2022. GNR is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Natural Resources Index. It was launched on Sep 13, 2010. Both CRIT and GNR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CRIT or GNR.
Correlation
The correlation between CRIT and GNR is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
CRIT vs. GNR - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CRIT:
0.09
GNR:
0.39
CRIT:
0.32
GNR:
0.60
CRIT:
1.04
GNR:
1.08
CRIT:
0.06
GNR:
0.36
CRIT:
0.15
GNR:
0.85
CRIT:
15.87%
GNR:
6.80%
CRIT:
26.97%
GNR:
14.74%
CRIT:
-37.25%
GNR:
-51.37%
CRIT:
-32.46%
GNR:
-7.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRIT achieves a 3.42% return, which is significantly lower than GNR's 8.22% return.
CRIT
3.42%
-2.57%
-4.25%
2.55%
N/A
N/A
GNR
8.22%
2.22%
-1.26%
6.04%
8.52%
5.15%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CRIT vs. GNR - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRIT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GNR's 0.40% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CRIT vs. GNR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CRIT
GNR
CRIT vs. GNR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Optica Rare Earths & Critical Materials ETF (CRIT) and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CRIT vs. GNR - Dividend Comparison
CRIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, less than GNR's 4.37% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRIT Optica Rare Earths & Critical Materials ETF | 1.93% | 1.99% | 2.72% | 0.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GNR SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF | 4.37% | 4.73% | 3.37% | 4.37% | 3.44% | 2.78% | 3.84% | 3.51% | 2.40% | 2.06% | 4.60% | 2.59% |
Drawdowns
CRIT vs. GNR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRIT drawdown since its inception was -37.25%, smaller than the maximum GNR drawdown of -51.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRIT and GNR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CRIT vs. GNR - Volatility Comparison
Optica Rare Earths & Critical Materials ETF (CRIT) has a higher volatility of 7.13% compared to SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) at 3.73%. This indicates that CRIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.