CRH vs. PAVE
CRH (CRH plc) is a stock, while PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) is Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Over the past 5 years, CRH returned 16.93%/yr vs 17.15%/yr for PAVE. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
CRH vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRH achieves a -23.32% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE's 18.14% return.
CRH
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- -11.64%
- 6M
- -21.83%
- YTD
- -23.32%
- 1Y
- 1.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.98%
- 5Y*
- 16.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.95%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.96%
PAVE
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -1.38%
- 6M
- 11.25%
- YTD
- 18.14%
- 1Y
- 26.28%
- 3Y*
- 20.94%
- 5Y*
- 17.15%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.01%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
CRH CRH plc | $460.47M | $403.89M | $494.78M |
| $109.69M | $125.02M | $111.27M |
CRH vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRH CRH plc | -23.32% | 36.87% | 35.93% | 81.33% | -20.51% | 27.09% | 8.78% | 57.05% | -26.48% | 4.87% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 18.14% | 19.36% | 17.92% | 31.01% | -7.17% | 36.42% | 19.72% | 33.26% | -19.15% | 13.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRH and PAVE is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2017 | 0.68 |
The correlation between CRH and PAVE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRH vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank
CRH
PAVE
CRH vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CRH plc (CRH) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRH | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.21 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | 2.06 | -2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.08 | 6.77 | -6.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRH vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRH drawdown since its inception was -65.58%, which is greater than PAVE's maximum drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRH and PAVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRH | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.58% | -44.08% | -21.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.16% | -11.91% | -15.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.16% | -26.23% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.66% | -26.23% | -12.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.16% | -5.89% | -21.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.50% | -6.19% | -12.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.29% | 3.62% | +8.67% |
Volatility
CRH vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison
CRH plc (CRH) has a higher volatility of 9.24% compared to Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) at 6.09%. This indicates that CRH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRH | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.24% | 6.09% | +3.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.81% | 16.61% | +8.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.89% | 20.42% | +12.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.08% | 21.71% | +9.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.84% | 24.37% | +6.47% |
Dividends
CRH vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison
CRH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, more than PAVE's 0.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRH CRH plc | 1.60% | 1.19% | 1.51% | 3.41% | 5.59% | 2.21% | 2.16% | 2.02% | 0.87% | 2.02% | 2.06% | 2.39% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.76% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRH and PAVE have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRH has higher volatility (9.24%) compared to PAVE (6.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRH dropped -65.58% vs PAVE's -44.08%.
PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRH and PAVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer