CRH vs. PAVE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CRH plc (CRH) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE).

PAVE is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. It was launched on Mar 6, 2017.

Performance

CRH vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CRH plc (CRH) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CRH vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CRH CRH plc	-14.60%	36.87%	35.93%	81.33%	-20.51%	27.09%	8.78%	57.05%	-26.48%	5.02%
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF	8.16%	19.36%	17.92%	31.01%	-7.17%	36.42%	19.72%	33.26%	-19.15%	14.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRH achieves a -14.60% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE's 8.16% return.

CRH

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: -9.47%
• YTD: -14.60%
• 6M: -10.77%
• 1Y: 21.23%
• 3Y*: 30.16%
• 5Y*: 21.02%
• 10Y*: 16.97%

PAVE

• 1D: 1.73%
• 1M: -6.65%
• YTD: 8.16%
• 6M: 9.30%
• 1Y: 37.33%
• 3Y*: 23.06%
• 5Y*: 16.25%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CRH vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRH

CRH Risk / Return Rank: 61
CRH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
CRH Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
CRH Omega Ratio Rank: 56
CRH Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
CRH Martin Ratio Rank: 66

PAVE

PAVE Risk / Return Rank: 85
PAVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
PAVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
PAVE Omega Ratio Rank: 80
PAVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
PAVE Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRH vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CRH plc (CRH) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRH	PAVE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.64	1.67	-1.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.18	2.37	-1.19
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.32	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.94	3.05	-2.11
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.99	11.19	-8.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRH vs. PAVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRH Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the PAVE Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRH and PAVE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRH	PAVE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64	1.67	-1.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70	0.76	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.64	-0.18

Correlation

The correlation between CRH and PAVE is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CRH vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison

CRH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, more than PAVE's 0.85% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRH CRH plc	1.41%	1.19%	1.51%	3.41%	5.59%	2.21%	2.16%	2.02%	0.87%	2.02%	2.06%	2.39%
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF	0.85%	0.92%	0.54%	0.68%	0.84%	0.48%	0.44%	0.67%	0.78%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CRH vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRH drawdown since its inception was -65.58%, which is greater than PAVE's maximum drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRH and PAVE.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRH	PAVE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.58%	-44.08%	-21.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.82%	-12.56%	-11.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.66%	-26.23%	-12.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.88%	-7.12%	-11.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.52%	-6.30%	-12.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.50%	3.42%	+4.08%

Volatility

CRH vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison

CRH plc (CRH) has a higher volatility of 10.35% compared to Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) at 7.82%. This indicates that CRH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRH	PAVE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.35%	7.82%	+2.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.67%	14.05%	+7.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.21%	22.45%	+10.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.26%	21.43%	+8.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.74%	24.41%	+6.33%