CRH vs. PANW
Compare and contrast key facts about CRH plc (CRH) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CRH or PANW.
Key characteristics
| CRH | PANW | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 46.63% | 34.98% |
| 1Y Return | 72.61% | 55.70% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 28.92% | 32.49% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 25.44% | 37.35% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 19.74% | 26.91% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.64 | 1.30 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.41 | 1.60 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.41 | 1.29 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.24 | 1.87 |
| Martin Ratio | 12.34 | 3.92 |
| Ulcer Index | 5.85% | 14.53% |
| Daily Std Dev | 27.39% | 43.93% |
| Max Drawdown | -65.58% | -47.98% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.08% | -0.02% |
Fundamentals
| CRH | PANW | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $68.00B | $130.25B |
| EPS | $4.99 | $7.29 |
| PE Ratio | 20.07 | 54.60 |
| PEG Ratio | 2.05 | 2.89 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $25.59B | $6.15B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $8.86B | $4.56B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $4.59B | $866.40M |
Correlation
The correlation between CRH and PANW is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CRH vs. PANW - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CRH achieves a 46.63% return, which is significantly higher than PANW's 34.98% return. Over the past 10 years, CRH has underperformed PANW with an annualized return of 19.74%, while PANW has yielded a comparatively higher 26.91% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CRH vs. PANW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CRH plc (CRH) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CRH vs. PANW - Dividend Comparison
CRH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, while PANW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRH CRH plc | 2.13% | 3.41% | 3.07% | 2.20% | 2.17% | 2.02% | 3.15% | 1.99% | 2.02% | 2.40% | 3.54% | 3.22% |
PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CRH vs. PANW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRH drawdown since its inception was -65.58%, which is greater than PANW's maximum drawdown of -47.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRH and PANW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CRH vs. PANW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CRH plc (CRH) is 6.11%, while Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) has a volatility of 8.22%. This indicates that CRH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PANW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CRH vs. PANW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CRH plc and Palo Alto Networks, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities