PortfoliosLab logo
CRH vs. PANW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CRH and PANW is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CRH vs. PANW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CRH plc (CRH) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

500.00%1,000.00%1,500.00%2,000.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
598.38%
2,024.68%
CRH
PANW

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CRH:

0.47

PANW:

0.75

Sortino Ratio

CRH:

0.89

PANW:

1.26

Omega Ratio

CRH:

1.11

PANW:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

CRH:

0.59

PANW:

1.01

Martin Ratio

CRH:

1.72

PANW:

3.06

Ulcer Index

CRH:

9.26%

PANW:

8.82%

Daily Std Dev

CRH:

34.18%

PANW:

36.28%

Max Drawdown

CRH:

-65.60%

PANW:

-47.98%

Current Drawdown

CRH:

-16.59%

PANW:

-9.67%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CRH:

$66.55B

PANW:

$124.56B

EPS

CRH:

$5.02

PANW:

$1.76

PE Ratio

CRH:

19.57

PANW:

106.89

PEG Ratio

CRH:

1.94

PANW:

2.30

PS Ratio

CRH:

1.87

PANW:

14.53

PB Ratio

CRH:

3.07

PANW:

19.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRH:

$29.04B

PANW:

$6.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRH:

$10.89B

PANW:

$4.86B

EBITDA (TTM)

CRH:

$3.97B

PANW:

$1.26B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRH achieves a -0.37% return, which is significantly lower than PANW's 3.40% return. Over the past 10 years, CRH has underperformed PANW with an annualized return of 15.03%, while PANW has yielded a comparatively higher 22.33% annualized return.


CRH

YTD

-0.37%

1M

13.05%

6M

-7.46%

1Y

15.23%

5Y*

28.76%

10Y*

15.03%

PANW

YTD

3.40%

1M

23.42%

6M

-2.31%

1Y

23.16%

5Y*

39.65%

10Y*

22.33%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CRH vs. PANW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CRH is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CRH is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CRH is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CRH is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CRH is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CRH is 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

PANW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PANW is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PANW is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PANW is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PANW is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PANW is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PANW is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CRH vs. PANW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CRH plc (CRH) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CRH Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the PANW Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRH and PANW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.47
0.75
CRH
PANW

Dividends

CRH vs. PANW - Dividend Comparison

CRH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, while PANW has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CRH
CRH plc
1.55%1.51%3.41%3.07%2.20%2.17%2.00%3.15%1.97%2.01%2.39%3.54%
PANW
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CRH vs. PANW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRH drawdown since its inception was -65.60%, which is greater than PANW's maximum drawdown of -47.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRH and PANW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-16.59%
-9.67%
CRH
PANW

Volatility

CRH vs. PANW - Volatility Comparison

CRH plc (CRH) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) have volatilities of 15.47% and 15.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
15.47%
15.38%
CRH
PANW

Financials

CRH vs. PANW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CRH plc and Palo Alto Networks, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00BAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
8.87B
2.26B
(CRH) Total Revenue
(PANW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CRH vs. PANW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CRH plc and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%AprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
35.6%
73.5%
(CRH) Gross Margin
(PANW) Gross Margin
CRH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CRH plc reported a gross profit of 3.16B and revenue of 8.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.6%.

PANW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.66B and revenue of 2.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.5%.

CRH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CRH plc reported an operating income of 1.10B and revenue of 8.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.5%.

PANW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of 240.40M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.

CRH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CRH plc reported a net income of 733.00M and revenue of 8.87B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.

PANW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a net income of 267.30M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.