PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRH vs. OC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CRH vs. OC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CRH plc (CRH) and Owens Corning (OC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRH achieves a -14.04% return, which is significantly lower than OC's 9.13% return. Over the past 10 years, CRH has outperformed OC with an annualized return of 16.25%, while OC has yielded a comparatively lower 10.78% annualized return.


CRH

1D
-0.22%
1M
-7.40%
YTD
-14.04%
6M
-9.55%
1Y
18.71%
3Y*
32.04%
5Y*
18.45%
10Y*
16.25%

OC

1D
-1.80%
1M
-1.89%
YTD
9.13%
6M
8.56%
1Y
-6.90%
3Y*
3.91%
5Y*
4.66%
10Y*
10.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRH vs. OC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CRH
CRH plc
-14.04%36.87%35.93%81.33%-20.51%27.09%8.78%57.05%-26.48%7.19%
OC
Owens Corning
9.13%-33.02%16.61%77.17%-4.23%20.93%18.12%50.63%-51.68%80.33%

Correlation

The correlation between CRH and OC is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2006

0.50

The correlation between CRH and OC shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

CRH:

$7.50

OC:

-$8.56

PS Ratio

CRH:

1.88

OC:

0.76

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRH:

$38.22B

OC:

$9.84B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRH:

$19.88B

OC:

$2.65B

EBITDA (TTM)

CRH:

$10.87B

OC:

$528.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRH vs. OC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRH
CRH Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
CRH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRH Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
CRH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRH Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

OC
OC Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
OC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
OC Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
OC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
OC Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRH vs. OC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CRH plc (CRH) and Owens Corning (OC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRHOCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.60

-0.19

+0.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.14

-0.03

+1.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.00

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.76

-0.21

+0.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.97

-0.39

+2.35

CRH vs. OC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRH Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is higher than the OC Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRH and OC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRHOCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

-0.19

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.14

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.31

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.22

+0.23

Drawdowns

CRH vs. OC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRH drawdown since its inception was -65.58%, smaller than the maximum OC drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRH and OC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRHOCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.58%

-85.22%

+19.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.46%

-37.33%

+12.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.01%

-52.48%

+25.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.66%

-52.48%

+13.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.25%

-66.57%

+13.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.34%

-40.94%

+22.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.50%

-20.63%

+2.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.39%

20.45%

-11.06%

Volatility

CRH vs. OC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CRH plc (CRH) is 10.65%, while Owens Corning (OC) has a volatility of 13.13%. This indicates that CRH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRHOCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.65%

13.13%

-2.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.72%

26.08%

-1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.08%

36.05%

-4.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.76%

34.50%

-3.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.02%

35.25%

-4.23%

Dividends

CRH vs. OC - Dividend Comparison

CRH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than OC's 2.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRH
CRH plc
1.43%1.19%1.51%3.41%5.59%2.21%2.16%2.02%0.87%2.02%2.06%2.39%
OC
Owens Corning
2.46%2.47%1.41%1.40%1.64%1.15%1.27%1.35%1.43%0.88%1.44%1.45%

Financials

CRH vs. OC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CRH plc and Owens Corning. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B202120222023202420252026
7.37B
2.27B
(CRH) Total Revenue
(OC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CRH vs. OC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CRH plc and Owens Corning over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202120222023202420252026
27.8%
22.5%
Portfolio components
CRH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CRH plc reported a gross profit of 2.05B and revenue of 7.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.8%.

OC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Owens Corning reported a gross profit of 510.00M and revenue of 2.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.5%.

CRH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CRH plc reported an operating income of -38.00M and revenue of 7.37B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.5%.

OC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Owens Corning reported an operating income of 120.00M and revenue of 2.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.

CRH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CRH plc reported a net income of -180.00M and revenue of 7.37B, resulting in a net margin of -2.4%.

OC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Owens Corning reported a net income of -105.00M and revenue of 2.27B, resulting in a net margin of -4.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRH and OC have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OC has higher volatility (13.13%) compared to CRH (10.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRH dropped -65.58% vs OC's -85.22%.

CRH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRH and OC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer