CRESY vs. BMA
Compare and contrast key facts about Cresud Sociedad Anónima Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria (CRESY) and Banco Macro S.A. (BMA).
Performance
CRESY vs. BMA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CRESY vs. BMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRESY Cresud Sociedad Anónima Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria | -0.48% | 8.03% | 46.53% | 73.99% | 45.48% | -1.46% | -31.96% | -40.52% | -42.64% | 42.79% |
BMA Banco Macro S.A. | -12.37% | -3.55% | 277.79% | 91.62% | 27.04% | -9.96% | -57.05% | -14.00% | -60.72% | 81.54% |
Fundamentals
CRESY:
$849.31M
BMA:
$4.98T
CRESY:
$3.62K
BMA:
$10.77
CRESY:
0.00
BMA:
7.23
CRESY:
0.00
BMA:
0.02
CRESY:
0.00
BMA:
0.35
CRESY:
0.00
BMA:
1.38
CRESY:
$1.06T
BMA:
$4.81T
CRESY:
$446.01B
BMA:
$3.27T
CRESY:
$404.46B
BMA:
$407.74B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRESY achieves a -0.48% return, which is significantly higher than BMA's -12.37% return. Over the past 10 years, CRESY has outperformed BMA with an annualized return of 7.03%, while BMA has yielded a comparatively lower 6.32% annualized return.
CRESY
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- 11.14%
- YTD
- -0.48%
- 6M
- 48.25%
- 1Y
- 19.33%
- 3Y*
- 42.26%
- 5Y*
- 28.08%
- 10Y*
- 7.03%
BMA
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 2.09%
- YTD
- -12.37%
- 6M
- 98.41%
- 1Y
- 6.63%
- 3Y*
- 78.01%
- 5Y*
- 52.57%
- 10Y*
- 6.32%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRESY vs. BMA — Risk / Return Rank
CRESY
BMA
CRESY vs. BMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cresud Sociedad Anónima Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria (CRESY) and Banco Macro S.A. (BMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRESY | BMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.38 | 0.09 | +0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.02 | 0.78 | +0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.09 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.73 | 0.14 | +0.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.65 | 0.31 | +1.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRESY | BMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | 0.09 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.89 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 | 0.10 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.18 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between CRESY and BMA is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CRESY vs. BMA - Dividend Comparison
CRESY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, more than BMA's 4.21% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRESY Cresud Sociedad Anónima Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria | 5.01% | 4.98% | 7.86% | 7.32% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.95% | 6.39% |
BMA Banco Macro S.A. | 4.21% | 2.38% | 6.10% | 7.75% | 7.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.20% | 5.05% | 0.65% | 1.53% |
Drawdowns
CRESY vs. BMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRESY drawdown since its inception was -88.67%, roughly equal to the maximum BMA drawdown of -91.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRESY and BMA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRESY | BMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.67% | -91.66% | +2.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.35% | -58.48% | +27.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.88% | -65.40% | +9.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.67% | -91.66% | +2.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.91% | -29.41% | +18.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.01% | -44.99% | -1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.85% | 26.49% | -12.64% |
Volatility
CRESY vs. BMA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cresud Sociedad Anónima Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria (CRESY) is 10.77%, while Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) has a volatility of 16.45%. This indicates that CRESY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CRESY | BMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.77% | 16.45% | -5.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.62% | 51.16% | -13.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.36% | 76.25% | -24.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.02% | 59.30% | -8.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.11% | 62.18% | -9.07% |
Financials
CRESY vs. BMA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cresud Sociedad Anónima Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria and Banco Macro S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CRESY vs. BMA - Profitability Comparison
CRESY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cresud Sociedad Anónima Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria reported a gross profit of 123.00B and revenue of 310.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.6%.
BMA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Banco Macro S.A. reported a gross profit of 802.92B and revenue of 802.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
CRESY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cresud Sociedad Anónima Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria reported an operating income of 66.23B and revenue of 310.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.3%.
BMA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Banco Macro S.A. reported an operating income of 488.39B and revenue of 802.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 60.8%.
CRESY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cresud Sociedad Anónima Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria reported a net income of 35.05B and revenue of 310.48B, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.
BMA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Banco Macro S.A. reported a net income of 69.19B and revenue of 802.92B, resulting in a net margin of 8.6%.