PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CRDO vs. ET
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CRDOET
YTD Return115.20%34.71%
1Y Return140.67%39.15%
Sharpe Ratio2.232.52
Sortino Ratio2.813.60
Omega Ratio1.361.45
Calmar Ratio4.291.71
Martin Ratio11.6020.71
Ulcer Index12.38%1.92%
Daily Std Dev64.40%15.77%
Max Drawdown-62.04%-87.81%
Current Drawdown-12.71%-0.87%

Fundamentals


CRDOET
Market Cap$7.71B$58.38B
EPS-$0.16$1.36
Total Revenue (TTM)$173.55M$83.66B
Gross Profit (TTM)$102.17M$14.03B
EBITDA (TTM)-$15.39M$12.39B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between CRDO and ET is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CRDO vs. ET - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CRDO achieves a 115.20% return, which is significantly higher than ET's 34.71% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%50.00%100.00%150.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
119.37%
12.60%
CRDO
ET

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CRDO vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRDO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CRDO, currently valued at 2.23, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.23
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CRDO, currently valued at 2.81, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.81
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CRDO, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.36
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CRDO, currently valued at 4.29, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.004.29
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CRDO, currently valued at 11.60, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0011.60
ET
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ET, currently valued at 2.52, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.52
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ET, currently valued at 3.60, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.60
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ET, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.45
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ET, currently valued at 6.46, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.006.46
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ET, currently valued at 20.71, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0020.71

CRDO vs. ET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRDO Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the ET Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRDO and ET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.23
2.52
CRDO
ET

Dividends

CRDO vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

CRDO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.44%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CRDO
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ET
Energy Transfer LP
7.44%8.96%7.33%7.44%17.28%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%2.61%3.19%

Drawdowns

CRDO vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRDO drawdown since its inception was -62.04%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRDO and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-12.71%
-0.87%
CRDO
ET

Volatility

CRDO vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) has a higher volatility of 19.42% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 4.25%. This indicates that CRDO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
19.42%
4.25%
CRDO
ET

Financials

CRDO vs. ET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items