PortfoliosLab logo
CRDF vs. ATXS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CRDF and ATXS is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CRDF vs. ATXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cardiff Oncology, Inc. (CRDF) and Astria Therapeutics, Inc. (ATXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CRDF:

-0.20

ATXS:

-0.91

Sortino Ratio

CRDF:

0.51

ATXS:

-1.36

Omega Ratio

CRDF:

1.06

ATXS:

0.84

Calmar Ratio

CRDF:

-0.20

ATXS:

-0.58

Martin Ratio

CRDF:

-0.61

ATXS:

-1.78

Ulcer Index

CRDF:

32.39%

ATXS:

32.33%

Daily Std Dev

CRDF:

106.63%

ATXS:

64.47%

Max Drawdown

CRDF:

-99.96%

ATXS:

-99.72%

Current Drawdown

CRDF:

-99.86%

ATXS:

-99.51%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CRDF:

$176.96M

ATXS:

$248.31M

EPS

CRDF:

-$0.95

ATXS:

-$1.68

PS Ratio

CRDF:

259.09

ATXS:

0.00

PB Ratio

CRDF:

2.11

ATXS:

1.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRDF:

$479.00K

ATXS:

$0.00

EBITDA (TTM)

CRDF:

-$37.42M

ATXS:

-$87.41M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRDF achieves a -38.71% return, which is significantly higher than ATXS's -52.68% return.


CRDF

YTD

-38.71%

1M

11.76%

6M

-13.64%

1Y

-21.53%

5Y*

14.75%

10Y*

-43.61%

ATXS

YTD

-52.68%

1M

4.19%

6M

-64.21%

1Y

-56.53%

5Y*

-34.88%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CRDF vs. ATXS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRDF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CRDF is 4444
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CRDF is 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CRDF is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CRDF is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CRDF is 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CRDF is 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

ATXS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ATXS is 88
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ATXS is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ATXS is 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ATXS is 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ATXS is 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ATXS is 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CRDF vs. ATXS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cardiff Oncology, Inc. (CRDF) and Astria Therapeutics, Inc. (ATXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CRDF Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is higher than the ATXS Sharpe Ratio of -0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRDF and ATXS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CRDF vs. ATXS - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRDF nor ATXS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CRDF vs. ATXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRDF drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, roughly equal to the maximum ATXS drawdown of -99.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRDF and ATXS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CRDF vs. ATXS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cardiff Oncology, Inc. (CRDF) is 23.44%, while Astria Therapeutics, Inc. (ATXS) has a volatility of 26.03%. This indicates that CRDF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CRDF vs. ATXS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cardiff Oncology, Inc. and Astria Therapeutics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00K100.00K150.00K200.00KAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
151.00K
0
(CRDF) Total Revenue
(ATXS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items