PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRDA.L vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CRDA.L vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Croda International plc (CRDA.L) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CRDA.L is traded in GBp, while ^GSPC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^GSPC values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CRDA.L having a 11.36% return and ^GSPC slightly lower at 11.24%.


CRDA.L

1D
-0.37%
1M
2.66%
YTD
11.36%
6M
10.70%
1Y
1.35%
3Y*
-19.51%
5Y*
-13.72%
10Y*
2.29%

^GSPC

1D
0.00%
1M
4.31%
YTD
11.24%
6M
9.66%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRDA.L vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CRDA.L
Croda International plc
11.36%-9.28%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
8.95%14.53%

Correlation

The correlation between CRDA.L and ^GSPC is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRDA.L vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRDA.L
CRDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CRDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
CRDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRDA.L vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Croda International plc (CRDA.L) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRDA.L^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.08

CRDA.L vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRDA.L^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

2.42

-2.02

Drawdowns

CRDA.L vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRDA.L drawdown since its inception was -74.48%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -8.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRDA.L and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRDA.L^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.48%

-8.03%

-66.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.15%

0.00%

-68.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.95%

-1.44%

-18.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.61%

Volatility

CRDA.L vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRDA.L^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.81%

11.47%

+19.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.00%

11.47%

+17.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.33%

11.47%

+13.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


CRDA.L and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRDA.L and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer