CRBN vs. SCHH

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) and Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH).

CRBN and SCHH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CRBN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target Index. It was launched on Dec 8, 2014. SCHH is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index. It was launched on Jan 13, 2011. Both CRBN and SCHH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

CRBN vs. SCHH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) and Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CRBN vs. SCHH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CRBN iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF	-2.68%	21.85%	19.29%	22.31%	-19.12%	18.82%	16.83%	28.65%	-9.80%	23.49%
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF	5.45%	2.20%	4.99%	11.18%	-24.99%	41.07%	-14.81%	22.85%	-4.26%	3.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRBN achieves a -2.68% return, which is significantly lower than SCHH's 5.45% return. Over the past 10 years, CRBN has outperformed SCHH with an annualized return of 11.58%, while SCHH has yielded a comparatively lower 3.46% annualized return.

CRBN

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: -3.48%
• YTD: -2.68%
• 6M: -0.30%
• 1Y: 19.20%
• 3Y*: 17.15%
• 5Y*: 9.39%
• 10Y*: 11.58%

SCHH

• 1D: 1.53%
• 1M: -4.18%
• YTD: 5.45%
• 6M: 3.75%
• 1Y: 4.49%
• 3Y*: 7.65%
• 5Y*: 3.84%
• 10Y*: 3.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRBN vs. SCHH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRBN has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHH's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

CRBN

iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF

SCHH

Schwab US REIT ETF

Return for Risk

CRBN vs. SCHH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRBN

CRBN Risk / Return Rank: 60
CRBN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
CRBN Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
CRBN Omega Ratio Rank: 61
CRBN Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
CRBN Martin Ratio Rank: 64

SCHH

SCHH Risk / Return Rank: 18
SCHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
SCHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
SCHH Omega Ratio Rank: 17
SCHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
SCHH Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRBN vs. SCHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) and Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRBN	SCHH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	0.28	+0.82
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.65	0.49	+1.16
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.07	+0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.70	0.40	+1.30
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.49	1.55	+5.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRBN vs. SCHH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRBN Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is higher than the SCHH Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRBN and SCHH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRBN	SCHH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.10	0.28	+0.82
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.21	+0.38
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69	0.17	+0.52
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.32	+0.30

Correlation

The correlation between CRBN and SCHH is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CRBN vs. SCHH - Dividend Comparison

CRBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, less than SCHH's 2.97% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRBN iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF	2.27%	2.21%	1.94%	2.01%	1.95%	1.57%	1.41%	2.27%	2.51%	2.05%	2.27%	2.01%
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF	2.97%	3.04%	3.22%	3.24%	2.55%	1.50%	2.86%	2.86%	3.64%	2.22%	2.81%	2.48%

Drawdowns

CRBN vs. SCHH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRBN drawdown since its inception was -33.13%, smaller than the maximum SCHH drawdown of -44.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRBN and SCHH.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRBN	SCHH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.13%	-44.22%	+11.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.08%	-9.59%	-0.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.04%	-33.28%	+6.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.13%	-44.22%	+11.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.73%	-5.65%	-1.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.27%	-9.54%	+4.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.64%	3.18%	-0.54%

Volatility

CRBN vs. SCHH - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) has a higher volatility of 6.49% compared to Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) at 4.96%. This indicates that CRBN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRBN	SCHH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.49%	4.96%	+1.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.41%	9.41%	+1.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.59%	16.27%	+1.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.01%	18.70%	-2.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.87%	20.97%	-4.10%