CR vs. MATX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CR (Crane Co.) and MATX (Matson, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — CR in Specialty Industrial Machinery, MATX in Marine Shipping. Over the past 3 years, CR returned 35.07%/yr vs 38.69%/yr for MATX. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CR vs. MATX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crane Co. (CR) and Matson, Inc. (MATX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CR achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than MATX's 52.04% return.

CR

• 1D: 2.48%
• 1M: 8.47%
• YTD: 1.43%
• 6M: 3.15%
• 1Y: 9.78%
• 3Y*: 35.07%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MATX

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 8.00%
• YTD: 52.04%
• 6M: 68.42%
• 1Y: 69.21%
• 3Y*: 38.69%
• 5Y*: 26.10%
• 10Y*: 21.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CR vs. MATX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CR Crane Co.	1.43%	22.17%	29.16%	65.09%
MATX Matson, Inc.	52.04%	-7.21%	24.30%	84.70%

Correlation

The correlation between CR and MATX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2023	0.42

Fundamentals

Market Cap CR : $10.95B MATX : $5.72B
EPS CR : $5.57 MATX : $13.63
PE Ratio CR : 33.48 MATX : 13.72
PS Ratio CR : 4.47 MATX : 1.77
PB Ratio CR : 5.22 MATX : 2.10
Total Revenue (TTM) CR : $2.44B MATX : $3.32B
Gross Profit (TTM) CR : $735.20M MATX : $610.50M
EBITDA (TTM) CR : $474.90M MATX : $712.90M

Return for Risk

CR vs. MATX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CR

CR Risk / Return Rank: 48
CR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
CR Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
CR Omega Ratio Rank: 45
CR Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
CR Martin Ratio Rank: 52

MATX

MATX Risk / Return Rank: 84
MATX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
MATX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
MATX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
MATX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
MATX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CR vs. MATX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crane Co. (CR) and Matson, Inc. (MATX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CR	MATX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.33	1.93	-1.61
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.64	2.82	-2.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.34	-0.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.40	2.81	-2.41
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.05	8.68	-7.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CR vs. MATX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CR Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the MATX Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CR and MATX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CR	MATX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33	1.93	-1.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.10	0.25	+0.85

Drawdowns

CR vs. MATX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CR drawdown since its inception was -28.02%, smaller than the maximum MATX drawdown of -71.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CR and MATX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CR	MATX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.02%	-71.40%	+43.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.39%	-24.05%	+0.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.02%	-46.90%	+18.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-53.63%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-53.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.02%	-0.83%	-10.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.14%	-33.33%	+27.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.97%	7.78%	+1.19%

Volatility

CR vs. MATX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Crane Co. (CR) is 8.76%, while Matson, Inc. (MATX) has a volatility of 13.07%. This indicates that CR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MATX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CR	MATX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.76%	13.07%	-4.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.78%	24.96%	+0.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.16%	36.01%	-5.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.62%	39.74%	-7.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.62%	42.20%	-9.58%

Dividends

CR vs. MATX - Dividend Comparison

CR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than MATX's 0.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CR Crane Co.	0.52%	0.50%	0.54%	0.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MATX Matson, Inc.	0.77%	1.13%	0.98%	1.15%	1.95%	1.18%	1.58%	2.11%	2.56%	2.61%	2.09%	1.64%

Financials

CR vs. MATX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Crane Co. and Matson, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crane Co. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 696.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MATX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Matson, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 757.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crane Co. reported an operating income of 100.10M and revenue of 696.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.

MATX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Matson, Inc. reported an operating income of 61.40M and revenue of 757.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.

CR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crane Co. reported a net income of 67.10M and revenue of 696.40M, resulting in a net margin of 9.6%.

MATX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Matson, Inc. reported a net income of 56.60M and revenue of 757.80M, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CR and MATX in my portfolio?

CR and MATX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CR or MATX?

MATX has higher volatility (13.07%) compared to CR (8.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CR dropped -28.02% vs MATX's -71.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MATX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.