CR vs. BMI
CR (Crane Co.) and BMI (Badger Meter, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — CR in Specialty Industrial Machinery, BMI in Electrical Equipment & Parts. Over the past 3 years, CR returned 32.81%/yr vs -5.44%/yr for BMI. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CR vs. BMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CR achieves a 16.05% return, which is significantly higher than BMI's -22.51% return.
CR
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- 6M
- 17.19%
- YTD
- 16.05%
- 1Y
- 10.89%
- 3Y*
- 32.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 37.57%
BMI
- 1D
- 3.04%
- 1M
- -7.90%
- 6M
- -7.80%
- YTD
- -22.51%
- 1Y
- -25.12%
- 3Y*
- -5.44%
- 5Y*
- 6.70%
- 10Y*
- 15.68%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $96.39M | $73.48M | $68.10M | |
| $135.89M | $109.27M | $104.37M |
CR vs. BMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CR Crane Co. | 16.05% | 22.17% | 29.16% | 58.49% |
BMI Badger Meter, Inc. | -22.51% | -17.15% | 38.28% | 30.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between CR and BMI is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2023 | 0.47 |
The correlation between CR and BMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
CR:
$12.33B
BMI:
$3.89B
CR:
$5.73
BMI:
$4.27
CR:
37.25
BMI:
31.43
CR:
4.83
BMI:
4.48
CR:
5.75
BMI:
4.84
CR:
$2.59B
BMI:
$880.96M
CR:
$492.90M
BMI:
$363.92M
CR:
$491.70M
BMI:
$188.13M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CR vs. BMI — Risk / Return Rank
CR
BMI
CR vs. BMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crane Co. (CR) and Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CR | BMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.91 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | -0.69 | +1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.06 | -1.36 | +2.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CR vs. BMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CR drawdown since its inception was -28.02%, smaller than the maximum BMI drawdown of -68.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CR and BMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CR | BMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.02% | -68.22% | +40.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.39% | -40.85% | +17.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.02% | -55.06% | +27.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.73% | -46.59% | +40.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.99% | -19.10% | +13.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.08% | 20.69% | -11.61% |
Volatility
CR vs. BMI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Crane Co. (CR) is 11.34%, while Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) has a volatility of 17.92%. This indicates that CR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CR | BMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.34% | 17.92% | -6.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.24% | 40.24% | -15.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.02% | 45.09% | -13.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.82% | 34.82% | -2.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.82% | 34.15% | -1.33% |
Dividends
CR vs. BMI - Dividend Comparison
CR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than BMI's 1.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMI Badger Meter, Inc. | 1.19% | 0.85% | 0.58% | 0.64% | 0.78% | 0.71% | 0.74% | 0.99% | 1.14% | 1.03% | 1.16% | 1.33% |
CR Crane Co. | 0.45% | 0.50% | 0.54% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CR vs. BMI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Crane Co. and Badger Meter, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CR vs. BMI - Profitability Comparison
CR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Crane Co. reported a gross profit of -281.30M and revenue of 724.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -38.8%.
BMI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Badger Meter, Inc. reported a gross profit of 90.77M and revenue of 222.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.8%.
CR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Crane Co. reported an operating income of 144.30M and revenue of 724.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.9%.
BMI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Badger Meter, Inc. reported an operating income of 39.38M and revenue of 222.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.7%.
CR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Crane Co. reported a net income of 95.90M and revenue of 724.70M, resulting in a net margin of 13.2%.
BMI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Badger Meter, Inc. reported a net income of 29.72M and revenue of 222.32M, resulting in a net margin of 13.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CR and BMI have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BMI has higher volatility (17.92%) compared to CR (11.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CR dropped -28.02% vs BMI's -68.22%.
CR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.30 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CR and BMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer