CR vs. ARES
CR (Crane Co.) and ARES (Ares Management Corporation) are both stocks. CR operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while ARES operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 3 years, CR returned 32.81%/yr vs 11.26%/yr for ARES. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CR vs. ARES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CR achieves a 16.05% return, which is significantly higher than ARES's -18.86% return.
CR
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- 6M
- 17.19%
- YTD
- 16.05%
- 1Y
- 10.89%
- 3Y*
- 32.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 37.57%
ARES
- 1D
- 3.20%
- 1M
- 9.57%
- 6M
- -12.38%
- YTD
- -18.86%
- 1Y
- -27.00%
- 3Y*
- 11.26%
- 5Y*
- 16.01%
- 10Y*
- 27.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 22.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $300.10M | $254.48M | $308.65M | |
| $135.89M | $109.27M | $104.37M |
CR vs. ARES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CR Crane Co. | 16.05% | 22.17% | 29.16% | 58.49% |
ARES Ares Management Corporation | -18.86% | -5.72% | 52.68% | 51.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between CR and ARES is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2023 | 0.41 |
The correlation between CR and ARES shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.45 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CR:
$12.33B
ARES:
$42.07B
CR:
$5.73
ARES:
$2.82
CR:
37.25
ARES:
45.35
CR:
4.83
ARES:
4.48
CR:
$2.59B
ARES:
$6.31B
CR:
$492.90M
ARES:
$4.46B
CR:
$491.70M
ARES:
$2.42B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CR vs. ARES — Risk / Return Rank
CR
ARES
CR vs. ARES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crane Co. (CR) and Ares Management Corporation (ARES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CR | ARES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.91 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | -0.57 | +0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.06 | -1.01 | +2.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CR vs. ARES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CR drawdown since its inception was -28.02%, smaller than the maximum ARES drawdown of -49.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CR and ARES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CR | ARES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.02% | -49.73% | +21.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.39% | -49.05% | +25.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.02% | -49.73% | +21.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -49.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.73% | -31.68% | +25.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.99% | -11.58% | +5.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.08% | 27.91% | -18.83% |
Volatility
CR vs. ARES - Volatility Comparison
Crane Co. (CR) has a higher volatility of 11.34% compared to Ares Management Corporation (ARES) at 10.26%. This indicates that CR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CR | ARES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.34% | 10.26% | +1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.24% | 36.42% | -11.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.02% | 43.02% | -11.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.82% | 37.79% | -4.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.82% | 36.50% | -3.68% |
Dividends
CR vs. ARES - Dividend Comparison
CR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than ARES's 4.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARES Ares Management Corporation | 4.52% | 3.29% | 2.10% | 2.59% | 3.57% | 2.31% | 3.40% | 3.59% | 7.50% | 5.65% | 4.32% | 6.81% |
CR Crane Co. | 0.45% | 0.50% | 0.54% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CR vs. ARES - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Crane Co. and Ares Management Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CR vs. ARES - Profitability Comparison
CR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Crane Co. reported a gross profit of -281.30M and revenue of 724.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -38.8%.
ARES - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ares Management Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.47B and revenue of 1.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 96.1%.
CR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Crane Co. reported an operating income of 144.30M and revenue of 724.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.9%.
ARES - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ares Management Corporation reported an operating income of 364.95M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.8%.
CR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Crane Co. reported a net income of 95.90M and revenue of 724.70M, resulting in a net margin of 13.2%.
ARES - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ares Management Corporation reported a net income of 142.59M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in a net margin of 9.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CR and ARES have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CR has higher volatility (11.34%) compared to ARES (10.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CR dropped -28.02% vs ARES's -49.73%.
CR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.30 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CR and ARES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer