PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CQQQ vs. XSD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CQQQ vs. XSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) and SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CQQQ achieves a 2.98% return, which is significantly lower than XSD's 87.88% return. Over the past 10 years, CQQQ has underperformed XSD with an annualized return of 5.85%, while XSD has yielded a comparatively higher 30.69% annualized return.


CQQQ

1D
-2.80%
1M
1.48%
YTD
2.98%
6M
3.86%
1Y
28.75%
3Y*
11.40%
5Y*
-7.83%
10Y*
5.85%

XSD

1D
-6.88%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
87.88%
6M
83.00%
1Y
147.65%
3Y*
43.10%
5Y*
26.73%
10Y*
30.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CQQQ vs. XSD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
2.98%34.96%9.84%-16.71%-30.09%-24.54%57.33%33.57%-34.77%74.31%
XSD
SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF
87.88%29.85%10.75%34.87%-30.92%42.54%61.95%64.66%-6.35%25.21%

Correlation

The correlation between CQQQ and XSD is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2009

0.54

The correlation between CQQQ and XSD shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (3 years) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CQQQ vs. XSD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CQQQ
XSD

Technology

61.0%
98.0%

Communication Services

20.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

13.0%

-

Financial Services

8.5%

-

Industrials

1.3%

-

Basic Materials

0.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

2.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

CQQQ
61.0%
XSD
98.0%

Communication Services

CQQQ
20.6%
XSD

-

Consumer Cyclical

CQQQ
13.0%
XSD

-

Financial Services

CQQQ
8.5%
XSD

-

Industrials

CQQQ
1.3%
XSD

-

Basic Materials

CQQQ
0.1%
XSD

-

Consumer Defensive

CQQQ

-

XSD

-

Energy

CQQQ

-

XSD
2.0%

Healthcare

CQQQ

-

XSD

-

Real Estate

CQQQ

-

XSD

-

Utilities

CQQQ

-

XSD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CQQQ vs. XSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CQQQ
CQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
CQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
CQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
CQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
CQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

XSD
XSD Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
XSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSD Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
XSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CQQQ vs. XSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) and SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CQQQXSDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.51

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

7.98

-6.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.70

26.27

-23.58

CQQQ vs. XSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the XSD Sharpe Ratio of 3.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CQQQ and XSD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CQQQ vs. XSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CQQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.99%, which is greater than XSD's maximum drawdown of -64.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQQQ and XSD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CQQQXSDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.99%

-64.56%

-9.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.41%

-18.61%

-5.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.93%

-41.25%

+5.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.96%

-42.27%

-24.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.99%

-42.27%

-31.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.92%

-7.06%

-41.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.35%

-13.72%

-14.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.68%

5.64%

+5.04%

Volatility

CQQQ vs. XSD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) is 10.74%, while SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) has a volatility of 22.76%. This indicates that CQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CQQQXSDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.74%

22.76%

-12.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.33%

33.53%

-10.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.65%

40.74%

-10.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.16%

39.20%

-1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.38%

35.44%

-2.06%

CQQQ vs. XSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CQQQ has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than XSD's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

CQQQ vs. XSD - Dividend Comparison

CQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, more than XSD's 0.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
2.10%2.17%0.28%0.55%0.08%0.00%0.47%0.01%0.43%1.41%1.69%1.77%
XSD
SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF
0.13%0.26%0.20%0.31%0.44%0.10%0.26%0.51%1.16%0.59%0.64%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


CQQQ and XSD have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XSD has higher volatility (22.76%) compared to CQQQ (10.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CQQQ dropped -73.99% vs XSD's -64.56%.

On 10-year performance, XSD leads with 30.69% vs 5.85% for CQQQ. On fees, XSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 10.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XSD has performed better with a 30.69% return vs 5.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CQQQ.

CQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.13% for XSD.

CQQQ is categorized as China Equities, while XSD is Semiconductors. CQQQ tracks FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index, while XSD tracks S&P Semiconductor Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for CQQQ and 0.35% for XSD.

XSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CQQQ and XSD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer