CQQQ vs. XSD
CQQQ (Invesco China Technology ETF) and XSD (SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CQQQ is a China Equities fund tracking the AlphaShares China Technology Index, while XSD is a Semiconductors fund tracking the S&P Semiconductor Select Industry. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CQQQ returned 5.40%/yr vs 31.10%/yr for XSD. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CQQQ charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XSD.
Performance
CQQQ vs. XSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CQQQ achieves a 2.46% return, which is significantly lower than XSD's 102.14% return. Over the past 10 years, CQQQ has underperformed XSD with an annualized return of 5.40%, while XSD has yielded a comparatively higher 31.10% annualized return.
CQQQ
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- 4.43%
- YTD
- 2.46%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 32.76%
- 3Y*
- 10.55%
- 5Y*
- -7.50%
- 10Y*
- 5.40%
XSD
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- 30.91%
- YTD
- 102.14%
- 6M
- 92.84%
- 1Y
- 180.25%
- 3Y*
- 46.41%
- 5Y*
- 29.69%
- 10Y*
- 31.10%
CQQQ vs. XSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF | 2.46% | 34.96% | 9.84% | -16.71% | -30.09% | -24.54% | 57.33% | 33.57% | -34.77% | 74.31% |
XSD SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | 102.14% | 29.85% | 10.75% | 34.87% | -30.92% | 42.54% | 61.95% | 64.66% | -6.35% | 25.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between CQQQ and XSD is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2009 | 0.54 |
The correlation between CQQQ and XSD shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (3 years) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CQQQ vs. XSD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CQQQ
XSD
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
CQQQ
XSD
Communication Services
CQQQ
XSD
-
Consumer Cyclical
CQQQ
XSD
-
Industrials
CQQQ
XSD
-
Financial Services
CQQQ
XSD
-
Basic Materials
CQQQ
XSD
-
Consumer Defensive
CQQQ
-
XSD
-
Energy
CQQQ
-
XSD
Healthcare
CQQQ
-
XSD
-
Real Estate
CQQQ
-
XSD
-
Utilities
CQQQ
-
XSD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CQQQ vs. XSD — Risk / Return Rank
CQQQ
XSD
CQQQ vs. XSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) and SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CQQQ | XSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.65 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 9.75 | -8.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.16 | 33.91 | -30.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CQQQ | XSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 5.00 | -3.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.20 | 0.78 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | 0.89 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.44 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
CQQQ vs. XSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CQQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.99%, which is greater than XSD's maximum drawdown of -64.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQQQ and XSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CQQQ | XSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.99% | -64.56% | -9.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.41% | -18.61% | -5.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.93% | -41.25% | +5.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.96% | -42.27% | -24.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.99% | -42.27% | -31.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.18% | 0.00% | -49.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.29% | -13.74% | -14.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.39% | 5.34% | +5.05% |
Volatility
CQQQ vs. XSD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) is 11.60%, while SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) has a volatility of 14.94%. This indicates that CQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CQQQ | XSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.60% | 14.94% | -3.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.88% | 27.89% | -6.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.78% | 36.39% | -6.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.02% | 38.25% | -0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.30% | 34.96% | -1.66% |
CQQQ vs. XSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CQQQ has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than XSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
CQQQ vs. XSD - Dividend Comparison
CQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, more than XSD's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF | 2.11% | 2.17% | 0.28% | 0.55% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 0.01% | 0.43% | 1.41% | 1.69% | 1.77% |
XSD SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | 0.12% | 0.26% | 0.20% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.10% | 0.26% | 0.51% | 1.16% | 0.59% | 0.64% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CQQQ and XSD have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSD has higher volatility (14.94%) compared to CQQQ (11.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CQQQ dropped -73.99% vs XSD's -64.56%.
On 10-year performance, XSD leads with 31.10% vs 5.40% for CQQQ. On fees, XSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 11.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XSD has performed better with a 31.10% return vs 5.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CQQQ.
CQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.11%, compared with 0.12% for XSD.
CQQQ is categorized as China Equities, while XSD is Semiconductors. CQQQ tracks AlphaShares China Technology Index, while XSD tracks S&P Semiconductor Select Industry. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for CQQQ and 0.35% for XSD.
XSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.00 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CQQQ and XSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer