PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CQQQ vs. VGK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


CQQQVGK
YTD Return17.61%5.48%
1Y Return17.40%17.99%
3Y Return (Ann)-14.82%1.67%
5Y Return (Ann)-3.25%6.59%
10Y Return (Ann)1.96%5.36%
Sharpe Ratio0.391.35
Sortino Ratio0.891.92
Omega Ratio1.101.23
Calmar Ratio0.201.59
Martin Ratio1.117.21
Ulcer Index13.56%2.49%
Daily Std Dev38.34%13.34%
Max Drawdown-73.99%-63.61%
Current Drawdown-60.65%-7.33%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between CQQQ and VGK is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CQQQ vs. VGK - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CQQQ achieves a 17.61% return, which is significantly higher than VGK's 5.48% return. Over the past 10 years, CQQQ has underperformed VGK with an annualized return of 1.96%, while VGK has yielded a comparatively higher 5.36% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
18.37%
-1.88%
CQQQ
VGK

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CQQQ vs. VGK - Expense Ratio Comparison

CQQQ has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than VGK's 0.08% expense ratio.


CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
Expense ratio chart for CQQQ: current value at 0.70% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.70%
Expense ratio chart for VGK: current value at 0.08% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.08%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CQQQ vs. VGK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) and Vanguard FTSE Europe ETF (VGK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CQQQ
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CQQQ, currently valued at 0.39, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.000.39
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CQQQ, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.89
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CQQQ, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.10
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CQQQ, currently valued at 0.20, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.20
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CQQQ, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.001.11
VGK
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VGK, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.001.35
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VGK, currently valued at 1.92, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.92
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VGK, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.23
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VGK, currently valued at 1.59, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.59
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VGK, currently valued at 7.21, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.007.21

CQQQ vs. VGK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the VGK Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CQQQ and VGK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.39
1.35
CQQQ
VGK

Dividends

CQQQ vs. VGK - Dividend Comparison

CQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than VGK's 3.05% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
0.47%0.55%0.08%0.00%0.47%0.01%0.43%1.42%1.69%1.77%1.00%0.79%
VGK
Vanguard FTSE Europe ETF
3.05%3.15%3.25%3.05%2.11%3.27%3.95%2.70%3.52%3.25%4.62%2.77%

Drawdowns

CQQQ vs. VGK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CQQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.99%, which is greater than VGK's maximum drawdown of -63.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQQQ and VGK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-60.65%
-7.33%
CQQQ
VGK

Volatility

CQQQ vs. VGK - Volatility Comparison

Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) has a higher volatility of 14.49% compared to Vanguard FTSE Europe ETF (VGK) at 4.28%. This indicates that CQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
14.49%
4.28%
CQQQ
VGK