CQQQ vs. CHIQ
CQQQ (Invesco China Technology ETF) and CHIQ (Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both China Equities funds - CQQQ tracks the FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index while CHIQ tracks the MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CQQQ returned 4.42%/yr vs 6.32%/yr for CHIQ. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CQQQ charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CHIQ.
Performance
CQQQ vs. CHIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CQQQ achieves a -0.60% return, which is significantly higher than CHIQ's -12.61% return. Over the past 10 years, CQQQ has underperformed CHIQ with an annualized return of 4.42%, while CHIQ has yielded a comparatively higher 6.32% annualized return.
CQQQ
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- -4.26%
- 6M
- -4.67%
- YTD
- -0.60%
- 1Y
- 12.26%
- 3Y*
- 7.52%
- 5Y*
- -5.62%
- 10Y*
- 4.42%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.51%
CHIQ
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 13.46%
- 6M
- -11.03%
- YTD
- -12.61%
- 1Y
- -11.86%
- 3Y*
- -1.64%
- 5Y*
- -8.27%
- 10Y*
- 6.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.17%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.03M | $735.04K | $809.72K | |
| $53.35M | $63.10M | $77.04M |
CQQQ vs. CHIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF | -0.60% | 34.96% | 9.84% | -16.71% | -30.09% | -24.54% | 57.33% | 33.57% | -34.77% | 74.31% |
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF | -12.61% | 13.69% | 10.74% | -10.70% | -22.01% | -27.07% | 92.61% | 44.19% | -28.65% | 67.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between CQQQ and CHIQ is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2009 | 0.83 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CQQQ and CHIQ has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
CQQQ vs. CHIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CQQQ
CHIQ
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
CQQQ
CHIQ
Communication Services
CQQQ
CHIQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
CQQQ
CHIQ
Industrials
CQQQ
CHIQ
Financial Services
CQQQ
CHIQ
-
Basic Materials
CQQQ
CHIQ
-
Consumer Defensive
CQQQ
-
CHIQ
Energy
CQQQ
-
CHIQ
-
Healthcare
CQQQ
-
CHIQ
-
Real Estate
CQQQ
-
CHIQ
Utilities
CQQQ
-
CHIQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CQQQ vs. CHIQ — Risk / Return Rank
CQQQ
CHIQ
CQQQ vs. CHIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) and Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CQQQ | CHIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.93 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | -0.34 | +0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.08 | -0.71 | +1.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CQQQ vs. CHIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CQQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.99%, which is greater than CHIQ's maximum drawdown of -67.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQQQ and CHIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CQQQ | CHIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.99% | -67.04% | -6.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.41% | -35.53% | +11.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.42% | -35.53% | +1.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.09% | -54.89% | -7.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.99% | -67.04% | -6.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.69% | -54.15% | +3.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.50% | -30.87% | +2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.34% | 16.85% | -5.51% |
Volatility
CQQQ vs. CHIQ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) has a higher volatility of 11.42% compared to Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) at 6.69%. This indicates that CQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CQQQ | CHIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.42% | 6.69% | +4.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.86% | 16.64% | +8.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.60% | 23.16% | +9.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.19% | 37.29% | +0.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.57% | 32.47% | +1.10% |
CQQQ vs. CHIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CQQQ has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than CHIQ's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
CQQQ vs. CHIQ - Dividend Comparison
CQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, more than CHIQ's 1.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF | 1.54% | 1.48% | 2.65% | 2.26% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 1.05% | 2.71% | 0.62% | 1.51% | 4.86% |
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF | 2.18% | 2.17% | 0.28% | 0.55% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 0.01% | 0.43% | 1.41% | 1.69% | 1.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CQQQ and CHIQ have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CQQQ has higher volatility (11.42%) compared to CHIQ (6.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CQQQ dropped -73.99% vs CHIQ's -67.04%.
On 10-year performance, CHIQ leads with 6.32% vs 4.42% for CQQQ. On fees, CHIQ is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, CHIQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CHIQ has performed better with a 6.32% return vs 4.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CHIQ is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CQQQ.
CQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.18%, compared with 1.54% for CHIQ.
CQQQ tracks FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index, while CHIQ tracks MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for CQQQ and 0.65% for CHIQ.
CQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CQQQ and CHIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer