PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CQP vs. NNN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CQP vs. NNN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) and NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CQP having a 21.30% return and NNN slightly higher at 21.41%. Over the past 10 years, CQP has outperformed NNN with an annualized return of 15.16%, while NNN has yielded a comparatively lower 3.97% annualized return.


CQP

1D
-2.68%
1M
-0.08%
6M
21.28%
YTD
21.30%
1Y
23.79%
3Y*
16.92%
5Y*
14.13%
10Y*
15.16%

NNN

1D
0.56%
1M
0.39%
6M
17.24%
YTD
21.41%
1Y
14.78%
3Y*
8.61%
5Y*
5.04%
10Y*
3.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CQP vs. NNN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CQP
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.
21.30%6.80%12.59%-5.09%44.79%27.83%-4.97%16.60%30.13%8.91%
NNN
NNN REIT, Inc.
21.41%2.81%-0.06%-0.60%-0.01%23.08%-19.29%14.78%17.82%2.00%

Correlation

The correlation between CQP and NNN is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2007

0.15

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CQP:

$30.56B

NNN:

$8.90B

EPS

CQP:

$5.21

NNN:

$2.05

PE Ratio

CQP:

12.12

NNN:

22.83

PEG Ratio

CQP:

0.38

NNN:

2.59

PS Ratio

CQP:

2.69

NNN:

9.45

PB Ratio

CQP:

391.79

NNN:

2.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

CQP:

$11.37B

NNN:

$935.78M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CQP:

$3.20B

NNN:

$761.54M

EBITDA (TTM)

CQP:

$3.96B

NNN:

$870.06M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CQP vs. NNN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CQP
CQP Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CQP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CQP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
CQP Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
CQP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
CQP Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

NNN
NNN Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
NNN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NNN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
NNN Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
NNN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
NNN Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CQP vs. NNN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) and NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CQPNNNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.15

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

1.69

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.33

3.87

-0.54

CQP vs. NNN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CQP Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is comparable to the NNN Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CQP and NNN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CQP vs. NNN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CQP drawdown since its inception was -78.70%, which is greater than NNN's maximum drawdown of -56.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQP and NNN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CQPNNNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.70%

-56.17%

-22.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.62%

-8.83%

-8.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.87%

-22.03%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.12%

-25.22%

-3.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.31%

-54.99%

-5.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.84%

-1.60%

-7.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.71%

-9.79%

-4.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.71%

3.85%

+2.86%

Volatility

CQP vs. NNN - Volatility Comparison

Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) has a higher volatility of 13.22% compared to NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) at 5.73%. This indicates that CQP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NNN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CQPNNNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.22%

5.73%

+7.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.67%

12.15%

+10.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.27%

17.10%

+11.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.79%

19.72%

+13.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.29%

28.10%

+4.19%

Dividends

CQP vs. NNN - Dividend Comparison

CQP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, which matches NNN's 5.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CQP
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.
5.18%6.15%5.06%8.36%6.82%6.30%7.28%6.08%6.07%5.79%5.90%6.52%
NNN
NNN REIT, Inc.
5.13%5.96%5.61%5.17%4.72%4.37%5.06%3.79%4.02%4.31%4.03%4.27%

Financials

CQP vs. NNN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. and NNN REIT, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
3.60B
240.42M
(CQP) Total Revenue
(NNN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CQP vs. NNN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. and NNN REIT, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
95.9%
Portfolio components
CQP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

NNN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NNN REIT, Inc. reported a gross profit of 230.63M and revenue of 240.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.9%.

CQP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. reported an operating income of 361.00M and revenue of 3.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.

NNN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NNN REIT, Inc. reported an operating income of 146.65M and revenue of 240.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 61.0%.

CQP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. reported a net income of 186.00M and revenue of 3.60B, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.

NNN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NNN REIT, Inc. reported a net income of 93.95M and revenue of 240.42M, resulting in a net margin of 39.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CQP and NNN have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CQP has higher volatility (13.22%) compared to NNN (5.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CQP dropped -78.70% vs NNN's -56.17%.

NNN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CQP and NNN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer