CPZ vs. DIVO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Calamos Long/Short Equity & Dynamic Income Term Trust (CPZ) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO).

DIVO is an actively managed fund by Amplify. It was launched on Dec 13, 2016.

Performance

CPZ vs. DIVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Long/Short Equity & Dynamic Income Term Trust (CPZ) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CPZ vs. DIVO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CPZ Calamos Long/Short Equity & Dynamic Income Term Trust	-5.40%	9.81%	15.98%	6.26%	-13.98%	21.23%	-3.49%	-1.64%
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF	2.01%	17.40%	16.22%	6.95%	-1.46%	22.87%	12.40%	1.76%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPZ achieves a -5.40% return, which is significantly lower than DIVO's 2.01% return.

CPZ

• 1D: 2.57%
• 1M: -8.41%
• YTD: -5.40%
• 6M: -11.16%
• 1Y: -2.78%
• 3Y*: 7.35%
• 5Y*: 2.77%
• 10Y*: —

DIVO

• 1D: 1.93%
• 1M: -3.36%
• YTD: 2.01%
• 6M: 4.92%
• 1Y: 17.49%
• 3Y*: 14.14%
• 5Y*: 10.98%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CPZ vs. DIVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPZ

CPZ Risk / Return Rank: 30
CPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
CPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
CPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 24
CPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
CPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 35

DIVO

DIVO Risk / Return Rank: 80
DIVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
DIVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
DIVO Omega Ratio Rank: 80
DIVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
DIVO Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPZ vs. DIVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Long/Short Equity & Dynamic Income Term Trust (CPZ) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CPZ	DIVO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.26	1.34	-1.60
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.29	1.96	-2.25
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.29	-0.33
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.14	2.03	-2.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.39	9.67	-10.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CPZ vs. DIVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the DIVO Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPZ and DIVO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CPZ	DIVO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.26	1.34	-1.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17	0.92	-0.75
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	0.83	-0.67

Correlation

The correlation between CPZ and DIVO is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CPZ vs. DIVO - Dividend Comparison

CPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.38%, more than DIVO's 6.49% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CPZ Calamos Long/Short Equity & Dynamic Income Term Trust	12.38%	11.49%	12.65%	11.63%	11.06%	8.37%	7.69%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF	6.49%	6.44%	4.70%	4.67%	4.76%	4.79%	4.91%	8.16%	5.27%	3.83%

Drawdowns

CPZ vs. DIVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPZ drawdown since its inception was -51.43%, which is greater than DIVO's maximum drawdown of -30.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPZ and DIVO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPZ	DIVO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.43%	-30.04%	-21.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.39%	-9.21%	-7.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.46%	-13.72%	-11.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.24%	-4.13%	-10.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.37%	-2.62%	-6.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.04%	1.93%	+4.11%

Volatility

CPZ vs. DIVO - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Long/Short Equity & Dynamic Income Term Trust (CPZ) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) at 3.57%. This indicates that CPZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CPZ	DIVO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.69%	3.57%	+1.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.00%	7.01%	-0.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.82%	13.17%	-2.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.01%	11.93%	+4.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.18%	14.93%	+9.25%