PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPT vs. FR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CPT vs. FR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Camden Property Trust (CPT) and First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (FR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, CPT has underperformed FR with an annualized return of 6.99%, while FR has yielded a comparatively higher 12.22% annualized return.


CPT

1D
2.63%
1M
4.32%
YTD
0.00%
6M
5.33%
1Y
-3.70%
3Y*
4.35%
5Y*
0.00%
10Y*
6.99%

FR

1D
0.58%
1M
-1.08%
YTD
6.39%
6M
9.78%
1Y
26.63%
3Y*
7.34%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
12.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPT vs. FR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CPT
Camden Property Trust
0.00%-1.48%21.31%-7.64%-35.58%83.40%-2.28%24.21%-0.98%13.33%
FR
First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.
6.39%18.17%-2.01%11.91%-25.37%60.33%4.24%47.37%-5.61%15.50%

Correlation

The correlation between CPT and FR is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 1994

0.55

The correlation between CPT and FR shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

CPT:

$3.60

FR:

$3.57

PE Ratio

CPT:

30.27

FR:

16.90

PS Ratio

CPT:

9.93

FR:

8.06

Total Revenue (TTM)

CPT:

$1.18B

FR:

$744.49M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CPT:

$725.73M

FR:

$450.27M

EBITDA (TTM)

CPT:

$1.12B

FR:

$506.99M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPT vs. FR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPT
CPT Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
CPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPT Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
CPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPT Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

FR
FR Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FR Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FR Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPT vs. FR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Camden Property Trust (CPT) and First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (FR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPTFRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.23

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.23

2.61

-2.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.43

8.30

-8.73

CPT vs. FR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPT Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the FR Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPT and FR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPTFRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

1.36

-1.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

0.26

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.50

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.20

+0.18

Drawdowns

CPT vs. FR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPT drawdown since its inception was -75.31%, smaller than the maximum FR drawdown of -95.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPT and FR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPTFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.31%

-95.42%

+20.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.05%

-10.24%

-5.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.87%

-25.42%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.22%

-35.95%

-14.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.22%

-41.12%

-9.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.89%

-6.21%

-22.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.90%

-25.36%

+12.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.58%

3.22%

+5.36%

Volatility

CPT vs. FR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Camden Property Trust (CPT) is 4.64%, while First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (FR) has a volatility of 5.52%. This indicates that CPT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPTFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.64%

5.52%

-0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.04%

13.69%

+0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.19%

19.61%

-0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.67%

22.81%

-0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.36%

24.35%

+0.01%

Dividends

CPT vs. FR - Dividend Comparison

CPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, more than FR's 3.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CPT
Camden Property Trust
3.87%3.82%3.55%4.03%3.36%1.93%3.32%3.02%3.50%3.26%8.62%3.65%
FR
First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.
3.04%3.11%2.95%2.43%2.45%1.63%2.37%2.22%3.01%2.67%2.71%2.30%

Financials

CPT vs. FR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Camden Property Trust and First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M202220232024202520260
194.83M
(CPT) Total Revenue
(FR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CPT and FR have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FR has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to CPT (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPT dropped -75.31% vs FR's -95.42%.

FR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPT and FR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer