CPSH vs. DAIO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CPS Technologies Corporation (CPSH) and Data I/O Corporation (DAIO).

Performance

CPSH vs. DAIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CPS Technologies Corporation (CPSH) and Data I/O Corporation (DAIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CPSH vs. DAIO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CPSH CPS Technologies Corporation	21.04%	91.93%	-31.49%	-12.64%	-29.02%	36.33%	175.25%	-17.89%	-25.90%	-11.23%
DAIO Data I/O Corporation	-20.19%	14.44%	-5.78%	-25.94%	-13.88%	11.89%	-2.99%	-15.06%	-58.47%	188.04%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CPSH : $68.03M DAIO : $23.76M
EPS CPSH : $26.57K DAIO : -$0.53
PS Ratio CPSH : 1.81 DAIO : 1.10
PB Ratio CPSH : 2.76 DAIO : 1.73
Total Revenue (TTM) CPSH : $32.60M DAIO : $21.50M
Gross Profit (TTM) CPSH : $5.29M DAIO : $10.60M
EBITDA (TTM) CPSH : $947.93K DAIO : -$4.62M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPSH achieves a 21.04% return, which is significantly higher than DAIO's -20.19% return. Over the past 10 years, CPSH has outperformed DAIO with an annualized return of 6.73%, while DAIO has yielded a comparatively lower 0.20% annualized return.

CPSH

• 1D: 7.78%
• 1M: -16.52%
• YTD: 21.04%
• 6M: 4.76%
• 1Y: 135.22%
• 3Y*: 9.48%
• 5Y*: -21.63%
• 10Y*: 6.73%

DAIO

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: -8.66%
• YTD: -20.19%
• 6M: -24.25%
• 1Y: 3.27%
• 3Y*: -20.15%
• 5Y*: -14.60%
• 10Y*: 0.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CPSH vs. DAIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPSH

CPSH Risk / Return Rank: 83
CPSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
CPSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
CPSH Omega Ratio Rank: 79
CPSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
CPSH Martin Ratio Rank: 82

DAIO

DAIO Risk / Return Rank: 41
DAIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
DAIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
DAIO Omega Ratio Rank: 39
DAIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
DAIO Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPSH vs. DAIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CPS Technologies Corporation (CPSH) and Data I/O Corporation (DAIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CPSH	DAIO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	0.08	+1.48
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.37	0.43	+1.95
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.05	+0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.93	0.03	+2.91
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.60	0.06	+6.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CPSH vs. DAIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPSH Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is higher than the DAIO Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPSH and DAIO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CPSH	DAIO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.56	0.08	+1.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.31	-0.31	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.07	0.00	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	-0.01	+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between CPSH and DAIO is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CPSH vs. DAIO - Dividend Comparison

Neither CPSH nor DAIO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CPSH vs. DAIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPSH drawdown since its inception was -95.17%, roughly equal to the maximum DAIO drawdown of -95.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPSH and DAIO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPSH	DAIO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.17%	-95.67%	+0.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-45.61%	-31.14%	-14.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-89.72%	-73.36%	-16.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-95.17%	-87.77%	-7.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-86.09%	-84.13%	-1.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-67.99%	-65.58%	-2.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.26%	12.74%	+7.52%

Volatility

CPSH vs. DAIO - Volatility Comparison

CPS Technologies Corporation (CPSH) has a higher volatility of 25.13% compared to Data I/O Corporation (DAIO) at 13.61%. This indicates that CPSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DAIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CPSH	DAIO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.13%	13.61%	+11.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	66.24%	31.00%	+35.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	87.23%	43.76%	+43.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	69.96%	47.50%	+22.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	98.10%	52.72%	+45.38%

Financials