PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CPG vs. XOM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CPGXOM
YTD Return24.02%17.13%
1Y Return29.94%9.16%
3Y Return (Ann)33.77%31.98%
5Y Return (Ann)21.34%14.11%
10Y Return (Ann)-11.10%5.78%
Sharpe Ratio0.670.22
Daily Std Dev33.70%21.42%
Max Drawdown-98.19%-62.40%
Current Drawdown-71.91%-5.05%

Fundamentals


CPGXOM
Market Cap$5.62B$466.92B
EPS$1.06$8.16
PE Ratio8.5614.46
PEG Ratio0.007.05
Revenue (TTM)$3.19B$335.35B
Gross Profit (TTM)$3.04B$133.72B
EBITDA (TTM)$2.14B$67.69B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between CPG and XOM is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CPG vs. XOM - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CPG achieves a 24.02% return, which is significantly higher than XOM's 17.13% return. Over the past 10 years, CPG has underperformed XOM with an annualized return of -11.10%, while XOM has yielded a comparatively higher 5.78% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
134.38%
501.48%
CPG
XOM

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Crescent Point Energy Corp.

Exxon Mobil Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CPG vs. XOM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crescent Point Energy Corp. (CPG) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CPG, currently valued at 0.67, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.67
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CPG, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.07
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CPG, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.14
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CPG, currently valued at 0.28, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.28
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CPG, currently valued at 1.88, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.001.88
XOM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XOM, currently valued at 0.22, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.22
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XOM, currently valued at 0.46, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.46
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XOM, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.05
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XOM, currently valued at 0.26, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.26
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XOM, currently valued at 0.53, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.53

CPG vs. XOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPG Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is higher than the XOM Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CPG and XOM.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.67
0.22
CPG
XOM

Dividends

CPG vs. XOM - Dividend Comparison

CPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, more than XOM's 3.21% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CPG
Crescent Point Energy Corp.
4.11%5.19%3.19%0.56%0.55%0.89%9.05%4.39%2.92%15.85%11.63%7.49%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
3.21%3.68%3.22%5.70%8.44%4.92%4.74%3.66%3.30%3.69%2.92%2.43%

Drawdowns

CPG vs. XOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPG drawdown since its inception was -98.19%, which is greater than XOM's maximum drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPG and XOM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-71.91%
-5.05%
CPG
XOM

Volatility

CPG vs. XOM - Volatility Comparison

Crescent Point Energy Corp. (CPG) has a higher volatility of 9.13% compared to Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) at 4.84%. This indicates that CPG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
9.13%
4.84%
CPG
XOM

Financials

CPG vs. XOM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Crescent Point Energy Corp. and Exxon Mobil Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items