PortfoliosLab logo
CPG vs. VFVA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CPG and VFVA is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CPG vs. VFVA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crescent Point Energy Corp. (CPG) and Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


CPG

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

VFVA

YTD

-4.56%

1M

4.35%

6M

-11.36%

1Y

0.14%

3Y*

7.15%

5Y*

18.06%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Crescent Point Energy Corp.

Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CPG vs. VFVA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CPG is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CPG is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CPG is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CPG is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CPG is 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CPG is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

VFVA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VFVA is 1717
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VFVA is 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VFVA is 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VFVA is 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VFVA is 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VFVA is 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CPG vs. VFVA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crescent Point Energy Corp. (CPG) and Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CPG vs. VFVA - Dividend Comparison

CPG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VFVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CPG
Crescent Point Energy Corp.
1.44%2.88%7.03%4.27%0.69%0.75%0.89%11.92%4.72%3.85%18.76%12.80%
VFVA
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF
2.59%2.40%2.45%2.21%1.68%2.04%2.09%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CPG vs. VFVA - Drawdown Comparison


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CPG vs. VFVA - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...