PortfoliosLab logo
CPG vs. ERF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CPG and ERF is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.4

Performance

CPG vs. ERF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crescent Point Energy Corp. (CPG) and Enerplus Corporation (ERF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CPG
ERF

Key characteristics

Fundamentals

PS Ratio

CPG:

0.00

ERF:

2.77

PB Ratio

CPG:

0.00

ERF:

3.42

Returns By Period


CPG

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

ERF

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CPG vs. ERF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CPG is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CPG is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CPG is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CPG is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CPG is 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CPG is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

ERF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ERF is 8686
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ERF is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ERF is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ERF is 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ERF is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ERF is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CPG vs. ERF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crescent Point Energy Corp. (CPG) and Enerplus Corporation (ERF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio
CPG
ERF

Dividends

CPG vs. ERF - Dividend Comparison

Neither CPG nor ERF has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CPG
Crescent Point Energy Corp.
1.44%7.03%4.27%0.69%0.75%0.89%11.92%4.72%3.85%18.76%12.80%
ERF
Enerplus Corporation
2.03%2.03%1.34%1.44%3.83%1.68%1.55%1.23%1.69%18.71%12.19%

Drawdowns

CPG vs. ERF - Drawdown Comparison


CPG
ERF

Volatility

CPG vs. ERF - Volatility Comparison

Crescent Point Energy Corp. (CPG) has a higher volatility of 8.43% compared to Enerplus Corporation (ERF) at 0.00%. This indicates that CPG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ERF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


CPG
ERF

Financials

CPG vs. ERF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Crescent Point Energy Corp. and Enerplus Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items