CPG.TO vs. CVE.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Crescent Point Energy Corp. (CPG.TO) and Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CPG.TO or CVE.TO.
Key characteristics
| CPG.TO | CVE.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 29.40% | 27.21% |
| 1Y Return | 35.08% | 32.98% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 38.94% | 44.91% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 19.87% | 20.76% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -9.08% | 0.85% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.16 | 1.29 |
| Daily Std Dev | 30.27% | 26.04% |
| Max Drawdown | -97.55% | -92.84% |
| Current Drawdown | -64.52% | -7.10% |
Fundamentals
| CPG.TO | CVE.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | CA$7.40B | CA$52.36B |
| EPS | CA$1.46 | CA$2.42 |
| PE Ratio | 8.17 | 11.60 |
| PEG Ratio | -1.03 | 0.28 |
| Revenue (TTM) | CA$3.19B | CA$53.34B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$3.04B | CA$16.00B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | CA$2.14B | CA$10.78B |
Correlation
The correlation between CPG.TO and CVE.TO is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
CPG.TO vs. CVE.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CPG.TO achieves a 29.40% return, which is significantly higher than CVE.TO's 27.21% return. Over the past 10 years, CPG.TO has underperformed CVE.TO with an annualized return of -9.08%, while CVE.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 0.85% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CPG.TO vs. CVE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crescent Point Energy Corp. (CPG.TO) and Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CPG.TO vs. CVE.TO - Dividend Comparison
CPG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, more than CVE.TO's 2.01% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPG.TO Crescent Point Energy Corp. | 4.00% | 5.30% | 3.16% | 0.56% | 0.59% | 0.69% | 8.70% | 3.76% | 2.74% | 13.09% | 10.26% | 6.69% |
CVE.TO Cenovus Energy Inc. | 2.01% | 2.38% | 1.77% | 0.56% | 0.81% | 1.61% | 2.08% | 1.74% | 0.99% | 4.87% | 4.44% | 3.18% |
Drawdowns
CPG.TO vs. CVE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPG.TO drawdown since its inception was -97.55%, which is greater than CVE.TO's maximum drawdown of -92.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPG.TO and CVE.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CPG.TO vs. CVE.TO - Volatility Comparison
Crescent Point Energy Corp. (CPG.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.04% compared to Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE.TO) at 6.20%. This indicates that CPG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CVE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CPG.TO vs. CVE.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Crescent Point Energy Corp. and Cenovus Energy Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities