CPER vs. SLX
Compare and contrast key facts about United States Copper Index Fund (CPER) and VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX).
CPER and SLX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CPER is a passively managed fund by Concierge Technologies that tracks the performance of the SummerHaven Copper Index Total Return. It was launched on Nov 15, 2011. SLX is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the NYSE Arca Steel Index. It was launched on Oct 16, 2006. Both CPER and SLX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CPER or SLX.
Key characteristics
| CPER | SLX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 15.99% | -4.83% |
| 1Y Return | 18.74% | 22.01% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 0.08% | 10.39% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 9.70% | 16.85% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 3.27% | 8.33% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.01 | 1.01 |
| Daily Std Dev | 17.94% | 21.28% |
| Max Drawdown | -54.04% | -82.15% |
| Current Drawdown | -6.35% | -6.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPER and SLX is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CPER vs. SLX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CPER achieves a 15.99% return, which is significantly higher than SLX's -4.83% return. Over the past 10 years, CPER has underperformed SLX with an annualized return of 3.27%, while SLX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.33% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CPER vs. SLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CPER has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than SLX's 0.56% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CPER vs. SLX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Copper Index Fund (CPER) and VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CPER vs. SLX - Dividend Comparison
CPER has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPER United States Copper Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLX VanEck Vectors Steel ETF | 2.94% | 2.80% | 4.97% | 7.07% | 1.87% | 2.76% | 6.25% | 2.43% | 1.06% | 5.34% | 3.26% | 1.97% |
Drawdowns
CPER vs. SLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPER drawdown since its inception was -54.04%, smaller than the maximum SLX drawdown of -82.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPER and SLX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CPER vs. SLX - Volatility Comparison
United States Copper Index Fund (CPER) has a higher volatility of 6.12% compared to VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX) at 4.84%. This indicates that CPER's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.