CPER vs. QQQ
CPER (United States Copper Index Fund) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CPER is a Copper fund tracking the SummerHaven Copper Index Total Return, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CPER returned 10.14%/yr vs 20.72%/yr for QQQ. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CPER charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
CPER vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPER achieves a 9.90% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 13.58% return. Over the past 10 years, CPER has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 10.14%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 20.72% annualized return.
CPER
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- 6M
- 6.90%
- YTD
- 9.90%
- 1Y
- 10.85%
- 3Y*
- 17.70%
- 5Y*
- 7.97%
- 10Y*
- 10.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.94%
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -5.91%
- 6M
- 12.30%
- YTD
- 13.58%
- 1Y
- 24.61%
- 3Y*
- 23.54%
- 5Y*
- 14.68%
- 10Y*
- 20.72%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.70%
CPER vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPER United States Copper Index Fund | 9.90% | 38.95% | 4.23% | 4.55% | -15.14% | 25.21% | 23.90% | 6.66% | -21.91% | 28.80% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 13.58% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPER and QQQ is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2011 | 0.29 |
Over the past year, CPER and QQQ have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.29, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPER vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
CPER
QQQ
CPER vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Copper Index Fund (CPER) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CPER | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.23 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.44 | 2.07 | -1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.90 | 7.22 | -6.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CPER vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPER drawdown since its inception was -54.04%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPER and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPER | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.04% | -82.97% | +28.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.77% | -11.96% | -12.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.77% | -22.77% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.75% | -35.12% | +0.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.42% | -35.12% | -3.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.37% | -6.61% | +1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.24% | -32.65% | +7.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.13% | 3.42% | +8.71% |
Volatility
CPER vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for United States Copper Index Fund (CPER) is 6.94%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 7.41%. This indicates that CPER experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CPER | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.94% | 7.41% | -0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.89% | 15.55% | +6.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.16% | 18.78% | +15.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.10% | 22.81% | +4.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.08% | 22.45% | +1.63% |
CPER vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CPER has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
CPER vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
CPER has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPER United States Copper Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CPER and QQQ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (7.41%) compared to CPER (6.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPER dropped -54.04% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 20.72% vs 10.14% for CPER. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, CPER has been the lower-risk option at 6.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 20.72% return vs 10.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for CPER.
QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.00% for CPER.
CPER is categorized as Copper, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. CPER tracks SummerHaven Copper Index Total Return, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: USCF and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for CPER and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CPER and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer