PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CPA vs. GBDC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CPAGBDC
YTD Return2.67%11.34%
1Y Return18.52%16.11%
3Y Return (Ann)13.92%10.44%
5Y Return (Ann)1.42%7.56%
10Y Return (Ann)1.98%8.00%
Sharpe Ratio0.761.20
Sortino Ratio1.211.74
Omega Ratio1.151.21
Calmar Ratio0.611.02
Martin Ratio1.992.41
Ulcer Index10.24%6.71%
Daily Std Dev26.74%13.53%
Max Drawdown-78.99%-47.60%
Current Drawdown-14.08%-7.10%

Fundamentals


CPAGBDC
Market Cap$4.10B$4.06B
EPS$16.33$1.59
PE Ratio6.049.65
PEG Ratio0.161.51
Total Revenue (TTM)$2.63B$397.98M
Gross Profit (TTM)$860.52M$410.35M
EBITDA (TTM)$837.01M$242.81M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between CPA and GBDC is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CPA vs. GBDC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CPA achieves a 2.67% return, which is significantly lower than GBDC's 11.34% return. Over the past 10 years, CPA has underperformed GBDC with an annualized return of 1.98%, while GBDC has yielded a comparatively higher 8.00% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.97%
-3.15%
CPA
GBDC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CPA vs. GBDC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Copa Holdings, S.A. (CPA) and Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CPA, currently valued at 0.76, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.76
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CPA, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.21
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CPA, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.15
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CPA, currently valued at 0.61, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.61
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CPA, currently valued at 1.99, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.99
GBDC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GBDC, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.20
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GBDC, currently valued at 1.74, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.74
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GBDC, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.21
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GBDC, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.02
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GBDC, currently valued at 2.41, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.41

CPA vs. GBDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPA Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the GBDC Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPA and GBDC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.76
1.20
CPA
GBDC

Dividends

CPA vs. GBDC - Dividend Comparison

CPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.44%, less than GBDC's 11.95% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CPA
Copa Holdings, S.A.
5.44%3.09%0.00%0.00%1.04%2.41%4.42%1.88%2.25%6.96%3.71%0.91%
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
11.95%10.00%9.35%7.58%8.37%6.99%8.49%7.47%8.32%7.70%7.14%6.70%

Drawdowns

CPA vs. GBDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPA drawdown since its inception was -78.99%, which is greater than GBDC's maximum drawdown of -47.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPA and GBDC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-14.08%
-7.10%
CPA
GBDC

Volatility

CPA vs. GBDC - Volatility Comparison

Copa Holdings, S.A. (CPA) has a higher volatility of 7.68% compared to Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC) at 4.27%. This indicates that CPA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.68%
4.27%
CPA
GBDC

Financials

CPA vs. GBDC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Copa Holdings, S.A. and Golub Capital BDC, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items