PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPA vs. BTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CPA vs. BTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Copa Holdings, S.A. (CPA) and British American Tobacco p.l.c. (BTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPA achieves a 29.89% return, which is significantly higher than BTI's 5.54% return. Over the past 10 years, CPA has outperformed BTI with an annualized return of 14.43%, while BTI has yielded a comparatively lower 6.74% annualized return.


CPA

1D
1.29%
1M
13.03%
YTD
29.89%
6M
26.63%
1Y
56.99%
3Y*
17.93%
5Y*
18.54%
10Y*
14.43%

BTI

1D
-0.02%
1M
-9.88%
YTD
5.54%
6M
6.66%
1Y
27.35%
3Y*
30.91%
5Y*
17.31%
10Y*
6.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPA vs. BTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CPA
Copa Holdings, S.A.
29.89%45.60%-11.54%32.38%0.62%7.03%-27.90%41.09%-39.17%50.74%
BTI
British American Tobacco p.l.c.
5.54%65.81%35.44%-19.97%14.91%7.95%-4.73%42.97%-49.35%24.40%

Correlation

The correlation between CPA and BTI is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2005

0.24

The correlation between CPA and BTI shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CPA:

$6.30B

BTI:

$129.17B

EPS

CPA:

$17.16

BTI:

£4.93

PE Ratio

CPA:

8.91

BTI:

9.04

PEG Ratio

CPA:

0.04

BTI:

0.34

PS Ratio

CPA:

1.67

BTI:

1.90

PB Ratio

CPA:

2.19

BTI:

2.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

CPA:

$3.77B

BTI:

£51.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CPA:

$1.23B

BTI:

£42.82B

EBITDA (TTM)

CPA:

$1.20B

BTI:

£20.34B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPA vs. BTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPA
CPA Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
CPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPA Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
CPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPA Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

BTI
BTI Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
BTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPA vs. BTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Copa Holdings, S.A. (CPA) and British American Tobacco p.l.c. (BTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CPABTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.21

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

2.00

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.08

4.38

+0.70

CPA vs. BTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPA Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the BTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPA and BTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CPA vs. BTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPA drawdown since its inception was -78.99%, which is greater than BTI's maximum drawdown of -64.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPA and BTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPABTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.99%

-64.11%

-14.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.22%

-13.75%

-15.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.47%

-13.75%

-19.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.52%

-29.94%

-12.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.94%

-56.00%

-22.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-11.69%

+11.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.75%

-12.93%

-14.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.26%

6.26%

+5.00%

Volatility

CPA vs. BTI - Volatility Comparison

Copa Holdings, S.A. (CPA) has a higher volatility of 13.03% compared to British American Tobacco p.l.c. (BTI) at 7.24%. This indicates that CPA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPABTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.03%

7.24%

+5.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.39%

18.61%

+16.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.11%

23.12%

+17.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.38%

21.21%

+15.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.95%

24.19%

+20.76%

Dividends

CPA vs. BTI - Dividend Comparison

CPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, less than BTI's 5.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTI
British American Tobacco p.l.c.
5.23%5.29%8.18%9.72%7.23%7.98%7.22%6.35%8.53%4.27%3.85%4.11%
CPA
Copa Holdings, S.A.
4.34%5.34%7.33%3.09%0.00%0.00%1.04%2.41%4.42%1.88%2.25%6.96%

Financials

CPA vs. BTI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Copa Holdings, S.A. and British American Tobacco p.l.c.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
1.05B
13.54B
(CPA) Total Revenue
(BTI) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CPA values in USD, BTI values in GBP

CPA vs. BTI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Copa Holdings, S.A. and British American Tobacco p.l.c. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
35.9%
83.4%
Portfolio components
CPA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Copa Holdings, S.A. reported a gross profit of 377.63M and revenue of 1.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.9%.

BTI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco p.l.c. reported a gross profit of 11.30B and revenue of 13.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.4%.

CPA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Copa Holdings, S.A. reported an operating income of 258.64M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.6%.

BTI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco p.l.c. reported an operating income of 4.93B and revenue of 13.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.4%.

CPA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Copa Holdings, S.A. reported a net income of 212.47M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in a net margin of 20.2%.

BTI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco p.l.c. reported a net income of 3.25B and revenue of 13.54B, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CPA and BTI have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CPA has higher volatility (13.03%) compared to BTI (7.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPA dropped -78.99% vs BTI's -64.11%.

CPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPA and BTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer