CP vs. BAM
Compare and contrast key facts about Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (CP) and Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CP or BAM.
Key characteristics
| CP | BAM | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 2.99% | -0.04% |
| 1Y Return | 1.05% | 25.46% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.05 | 1.05 |
| Daily Std Dev | 20.85% | 26.56% |
| Max Drawdown | -69.21% | -20.47% |
| Current Drawdown | -10.91% | -6.73% |
Fundamentals
| CP | BAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $74.45B | $15.22B |
| EPS | $3.05 | $1.13 |
| PE Ratio | 26.14 | 34.63 |
| PEG Ratio | 2.37 | 4.84 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13.81B | $4.06B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $4.80B | $2.74B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $7.03B | $2.63B |
Correlation
The correlation between CP and BAM is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CP vs. BAM - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CP achieves a 2.99% return, which is significantly higher than BAM's -0.04% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CP vs. BAM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (CP) and Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CP vs. BAM - Dividend Comparison
CP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than BAM's 3.37% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CP Canadian Pacific Railway Limited | 0.70% | 0.72% | 0.77% | 1.67% | 3.82% | 0.93% | 1.07% | 0.93% | 0.98% | 0.84% | 0.65% | 0.89% |
BAM Brookfield Asset Management Inc. | 3.37% | 3.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CP vs. BAM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CP drawdown since its inception was -69.21%, which is greater than BAM's maximum drawdown of -20.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CP and BAM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CP vs. BAM - Volatility Comparison
Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (CP) has a higher volatility of 9.29% compared to Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM) at 8.46%. This indicates that CP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CP vs. BAM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Pacific Railway Limited and Brookfield Asset Management Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities