COWZ vs. VONG
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG).
COWZ and VONG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. COWZ is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2016. VONG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010. Both COWZ and VONG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: COWZ or VONG.
Correlation
The correlation between COWZ and VONG is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
COWZ vs. VONG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
COWZ:
0.86
VONG:
2.15
COWZ:
1.29
VONG:
2.77
COWZ:
1.15
VONG:
1.39
COWZ:
1.35
VONG:
2.81
COWZ:
3.46
VONG:
11.01
COWZ:
3.37%
VONG:
3.35%
COWZ:
13.65%
VONG:
17.17%
COWZ:
-38.63%
VONG:
-32.72%
COWZ:
-7.43%
VONG:
-2.62%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COWZ achieves a 10.79% return, which is significantly lower than VONG's 35.22% return.
COWZ
10.79%
-4.05%
4.13%
10.69%
15.08%
N/A
VONG
35.22%
3.63%
12.28%
35.39%
19.34%
16.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
COWZ vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison
COWZ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.08% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
COWZ vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
COWZ vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison
COWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, more than VONG's 0.41% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.92% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.41% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% | 1.43% | 1.28% |
Drawdowns
COWZ vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COWZ drawdown since its inception was -38.63%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COWZ and VONG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
COWZ vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) is 4.55%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 4.94%. This indicates that COWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.