COWZ vs. RYLD
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD).
COWZ and RYLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. COWZ is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2016. RYLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE Russell 2000 BuyWrite Index. It was launched on Apr 17, 2019. Both COWZ and RYLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: COWZ or RYLD.
Key characteristics
| COWZ | RYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 4.76% | 1.68% |
| 1Y Return | 21.04% | 3.72% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 11.02% | -1.84% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 15.26% | 3.03% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.35 | 0.23 |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.72% | 9.98% |
| Max Drawdown | -38.63% | -41.53% |
| Current Drawdown | -6.68% | -13.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between COWZ and RYLD is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
COWZ vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, COWZ achieves a 4.76% return, which is significantly higher than RYLD's 1.68% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
COWZ vs. RYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
COWZ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than RYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
COWZ vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
COWZ vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison
COWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than RYLD's 12.39% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.91% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 0.13% |
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF | 12.39% | 12.64% | 13.50% | 12.35% | 10.76% | 6.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
COWZ vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COWZ drawdown since its inception was -38.63%, smaller than the maximum RYLD drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COWZ and RYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
COWZ vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) has a higher volatility of 3.79% compared to Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) at 2.72%. This indicates that COWZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.