PortfoliosLab logo
COWG vs. BDGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between COWG and BDGS is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

COWG vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

COWG:

18.44%

BDGS:

4.27%

Max Drawdown

COWG:

-1.52%

BDGS:

-0.37%

Current Drawdown

COWG:

0.00%

BDGS:

0.00%

Returns By Period


COWG

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BDGS

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


COWG vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

COWG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

COWG vs. BDGS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COWG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COWG is 8686
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COWG is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COWG is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COWG is 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COWG is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COWG is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

BDGS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BDGS is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

COWG vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

COWG vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

COWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than BDGS's 1.80% yield.


Drawdowns

COWG vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COWG drawdown since its inception was -1.52%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -0.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COWG and BDGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

COWG vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...