PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
COW vs. QQQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

COW vs. QQQ

Last updated May 21, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about iPath Series B Bloomberg Livestock Subindex Total Return ETN (COW) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ).

COW and QQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. COW is a passively managed fund by Barclays Capital that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Livestock. It was launched on Jan 17, 2018. QQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 10, 1999. Both COW and QQQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: COW or QQQ.

Correlation

The correlation between COW and QQQ is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

COW vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iPath Series B Bloomberg Livestock Subindex Total Return ETN (COW) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period

COW

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

QQQ

YTD

1.92%

1M

17.15%

6M

3.66%

1Y

15.07%

3Y*

22.52%

5Y*

18.59%

10Y*

17.68%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iPath Series B Bloomberg Livestock Subindex Total Return ETN

Invesco QQQ

COW vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

COW has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio.

COW
iPath Series B Bloomberg Livestock Subindex Total Return ETN
QQQ
Invesco QQQ

Risk-Adjusted Performance

COW vs. QQQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
COW
QQQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QQQ is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QQQ is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QQQ is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QQQ is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QQQ is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

COW vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iPath Series B Bloomberg Livestock Subindex Total Return ETN (COW) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

No data
No data
No data
No data

Loading data...

Dividends

COW vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

COW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.

TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
COW
iPath Series B Bloomberg Livestock Subindex Total Return ETN		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ		0.57%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%1.41%

Drawdowns

COW vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

Loading data...

Volatility

COW vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Loading data...