COW vs. MOO
Compare and contrast key facts about iPath Series B Bloomberg Livestock Subindex Total Return ETN (COW) and VanEck Vectors Agribusiness ETF (MOO).
COW and MOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. COW is a passively managed fund by Barclays Capital that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Livestock. It was launched on Jan 17, 2018. MOO is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the DAXglobal Agribusiness Index. It was launched on Aug 31, 2007. Both COW and MOO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: COW or MOO.
Correlation
The correlation between COW and MOO is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
COW vs. MOO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
Returns By Period
COW
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
MOO
5.58%
0.13%
-3.66%
-2.91%
2.80%
4.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
COW vs. MOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
COW has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than MOO's 0.54% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
COW vs. MOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
COW
MOO
COW vs. MOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iPath Series B Bloomberg Livestock Subindex Total Return ETN (COW) and VanEck Vectors Agribusiness ETF (MOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
COW vs. MOO - Dividend Comparison
COW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COW iPath Series B Bloomberg Livestock Subindex Total Return ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MOO VanEck Vectors Agribusiness ETF | 3.23% | 3.41% | 2.94% | 2.15% | 1.17% | 1.10% | 1.32% | 1.69% | 1.44% | 2.14% | 2.89% | 3.21% |
Drawdowns
COW vs. MOO - Drawdown Comparison
Volatility
COW vs. MOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iPath Series B Bloomberg Livestock Subindex Total Return ETN (COW) is 0.00%, while VanEck Vectors Agribusiness ETF (MOO) has a volatility of 4.15%. This indicates that COW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.