COW vs. CWW.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iPath Series B Bloomberg Livestock Subindex Total Return ETN (COW) and iShares Global Water Index ETF (CWW.TO).
COW and CWW.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. COW is a passively managed fund by Barclays Capital that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Livestock. It was launched on Jan 17, 2018. CWW.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD. It was launched on Jun 4, 2007. Both COW and CWW.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: COW or CWW.TO.
Correlation
The correlation between COW and CWW.TO is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
COW vs. CWW.TO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
Returns By Period
COW
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CWW.TO
-2.35%
-15.25%
-12.28%
1.81%
5.60%
8.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
COW vs. CWW.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
COW has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than CWW.TO's 0.66% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
COW vs. CWW.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
COW
CWW.TO
COW vs. CWW.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iPath Series B Bloomberg Livestock Subindex Total Return ETN (COW) and iShares Global Water Index ETF (CWW.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
COW vs. CWW.TO - Dividend Comparison
COW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CWW.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COW iPath Series B Bloomberg Livestock Subindex Total Return ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CWW.TO iShares Global Water Index ETF | 1.10% | 1.07% | 1.20% | 1.30% | 2.67% | 1.13% | 1.27% | 3.01% | 1.44% | 1.63% | 1.18% | 1.20% |
Drawdowns
COW vs. CWW.TO - Drawdown Comparison
Volatility
COW vs. CWW.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iPath Series B Bloomberg Livestock Subindex Total Return ETN (COW) is 0.00%, while iShares Global Water Index ETF (CWW.TO) has a volatility of 10.70%. This indicates that COW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CWW.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.