COST vs. SCHD

Last updated Jul 28, 2026

COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) is a stock, while SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) is Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Over the past 10 years, COST returned 21.05%/yr vs 12.64%/yr for SCHD. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

COST vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COST achieves a 10.84% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 23.88% return. Over the past 10 years, COST has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 21.05%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.64% annualized return.

COST

• 1D: 1.77%
• 1M: 0.06%
• 6M: -2.24%
• YTD: 10.84%
• 1Y: 2.46%
• 3Y*: 20.76%
• 5Y*: 18.96%
• 10Y*: 21.05%
• ALL TIME*: 16.99%

SCHD

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 4.18%
• 6M: 16.45%
• YTD: 23.88%
• 1Y: 26.86%
• 3Y*: 13.98%
• 5Y*: 9.59%
• 10Y*: 12.64%
• ALL TIME*: 13.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation	$1.93B	$2.18B	$2.32B
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF	$673.01M	$662.07M	$663.05M

COST vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation	10.84%	-5.39%	39.62%	49.00%	-19.05%	51.82%	32.67%	45.70%	10.60%	22.37%
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF	23.88%	4.34%	11.66%	4.54%	-3.26%	29.87%	15.03%	27.29%	-5.56%	20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between COST and SCHD is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.28
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.41
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011	0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between COST and SCHD has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

COST vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COST

COST Risk / Return Rank: 48
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 43
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 51

SCHD

SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 93
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 91
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COST vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	COST	SCHD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.12	2.44	-2.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.31	3.79	-3.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.44	-0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.15	5.85	-5.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.32	14.50	-14.18

COST vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COST Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COST and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

COST vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COST drawdown since its inception was -53.39%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COST and SCHD.

Drawdown Indicators

	COST	SCHD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.39%	-33.37%	-20.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.57%	-4.61%	-11.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.74%	-16.13%	-4.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.40%	-16.85%	-14.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.40%	-33.37%	+1.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.91%	0.00%	-12.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.36%	-3.30%	-10.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.66%	1.88%	+5.78%

Volatility

COST vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) has a higher volatility of 7.15% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.82%. This indicates that COST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COST	SCHD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.15%	3.82%	+3.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.97%	7.91%	+7.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.83%	11.09%	+8.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.91%	14.37%	+8.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.02%	16.72%	+5.30%

Dividends

COST vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than SCHD's 3.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation	0.72%	0.59%	0.49%	2.87%	0.76%	0.54%	3.38%	0.86%	1.08%	4.81%	1.09%	4.06%
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF	3.13%	3.82%	3.64%	3.49%	3.39%	2.78%	3.16%	2.98%	3.06%	2.63%	2.89%	2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COST and SCHD in my portfolio?

COST and SCHD have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, COST or SCHD?

COST has higher volatility (7.15%) compared to SCHD (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COST dropped -53.39% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.